MatchWiz

Baycurrent Classic

October 8, 2026 – October 11, 2026 · 📺 Golf Chnl

FedEx Cup Standings

Board

72 players · through round 2 of 4 · score + win/finish odds, expand for the card
🏁 End of R2 leader · live
Bridgeman43%+131Mitchell12%+718Meissner11%+771Castillo6.1%+1542Coody5.2%+1816Ventura4.6%+2069
R1-863
R2-1 · thru 13
Leads R2 43%Top 30 99% -18768
R1-566
R2-2 · thru 39
Leads R2 12%Top 30 97% -3837Pre-tournament #13
Baycurrent Classic — past results
2025Finished 10-11SG +1.8
R1-665
R2-1 · thru 310
Leads R2 11%Top 30 96% -2304Pre-tournament #25
Baycurrent Classic — past results
2025Finished 30-7SG +0.8
R1-368
R2-3 · thru 725
Leads R2 1.6%Top 30 91% -975Pre-tournament #12
Baycurrent Classic — past results
2025Finished 11-11SG +1.8
R1-764
R2+1 · thru 626
Leads R2 0.9%Top 30 84% -515
R1-665
R2E · thru 28
Leads R2 5.2%Top 30 91% -994
R1-566
R2-1 · thru 310
Leads R2 4.6%Top 30 91% -959
R1-665
R2E · thru 28
Leads R2 6.1%Top 30 94% -1472
R1-368
R2-2 · thru 623
Leads R2 0.2%Top 30 74% -277Pre-tournament #9
Baycurrent Classic — past results
2025Finished 28-7SG +0.8
R1-566
R2E · thru 416
Leads R2 0.9%Top 30 76% -310Pre-tournament #60
Baycurrent Classic — past results
2025Finished 52-1SG -0.7

Every number on this board runs through DataGolf's strokes-gained model — the skill metric that measures how a player performs relative to the field on every shot, not just whether they had a good week. Win odds, top-finish probabilities, group picks, DFS projections: it all starts from SG. And every pre-event call gets frozen before the first tee shot and graded publicly after the final round. The record is here if you want to check it.

What's on the board

Six tabs, each a different lens on the same field:

  • Board — live scores with our win and top-finish probabilities beside every player. Expand any card for the full round-by-round scorecard and that player's past results at this track.
  • Groups — round-by-round 2-ball and 3-ball picks: who we project to post the lowest score in each pairing. Every pick is graded after the group finishes.
  • Value — spots where our projected finish probability beats the book's implied odds by at least 1.5 points. If nothing clears that threshold this week, the tab says so.
  • DFS · DK and DFS · FD — a lineup optimizer per book, on each site's own main slate. Two tabs, not a toggle: DraftKings rosters six golfers under $50,000 and FanDuel six under $60,000, and the projected points are scored by different rules. A lineup built on one is illegal on the other.
  • Report card — the graded archive. Every past event, what we projected, where players actually finished. Nothing hidden.

The model in brief

DataGolf reconstructs strokes-gained skill ratings from round-level data going back years. A player's SG reflects how they're actually striking the ball and putting — not just their most recent finish. Once the field is set, the model runs a simulation: given these SG ratings, how likely is each player to win, make the cut, or finish in the top 5, 10, or 20? The simulation accounts for real variance in SG — skilled players have bad weeks — and returns a probability for each finish bucket.

Once play starts, those projections update round by round. The live model blends current leaderboard position with the player's underlying SG — so a leader running hot gets a slight haircut and a skilled player sitting two back picks up more win equity than the raw gap implies. The full methodology is on the how it works page.

Where the edge is — and where it isn't

The honest version most golf content skips: most markets are efficiently priced, and we won't pretend otherwise. We check the outright winner market and make-cut lines in every snapshot. Both almost always come back clean — the books calibrate those markets closely, so real gaps are rare once you account for the vig. You'll see them on the Value tab listed as efficient on weeks when nothing qualifies.

Derivative markets are softer. Books invest less pricing effort in top-5, top-10, and top-20 finish lines — and that's where DataGolf's model finds real discrepancies. When our projected probability exceeds the book's implied number by 1.5+ percentage points, the play shows up on the Value tab. That threshold isn't arbitrary: below it, the vig alone eats the apparent edge. Some weeks, nothing qualifies. The board says so.

The receipts

Across 172 graded events, when MatchWiz projected a player inside the top 10 before the tournament, 28% of those picks actually finished top 10. Make-cut accuracy — players modeled as more likely to make the cut than miss — has landed at 64% across the events that had a cut. Every projection is frozen at the opening tee shot: the numbers don't move once the round starts, and the grades are posted publicly after the final round. Pull up any past event on the report card and see exactly what we said before it happened.

28%Top-10 projected → finished top 10 · 172 events
64%Make-cut prediction accuracy
22%Top-5 projected → finished top 5

How to use it

For betting research: start on the Value tab. Qualifying plays are the spots our model found a real price gap — the card shows the book's line and the implied probability it's set at. Pull up a player's board card for their SG rank and projected finish probability to understand why they cleared our threshold.

For DFS: open the tab for the site you play — DK or FD — check the wave column, and sort by value (projected points per $1,000 of salary). The optimizer builds cap-legal lineups around your locks automatically, under that book's cap. Wave matters more than most DFS tools acknowledge: on a links course on a windy day, the AM and PM draws can separate field scoring by more than a full stroke. Tilt toward the better draw before you finalise.

For round-by-round interest: check the Groups tab before each round starts. You get a pick for every pairing, graded after the group finishes. It's the most granular lens on the model — one clear signal per group, per round.

For the full picture: browse the report card. Every past event, what the model said before it started, and where everyone finished. That's the ledger — the same one that tells us which inputs are earning their weight.

The traps

  • Playing the outright winner market on SG rank alone. SG tells you who's best. It doesn't tell you whether the posted odds are fair — a great player can be correctly priced or overpriced. Always check the implied probability against our model number first.
  • Treating last week's winner as a hot hand. SG averages out single-tournament noise on purpose. A player who won last week may have outshot their underlying SG by two strokes — that usually reverts. The model already accounts for it.
  • Ignoring wave split in DFS. On calm weeks at parkland courses, the AM and PM draws matter less. On a links or mountain course on a windy day, the tee-time split can be worth more than a full stroke of projected SG. Check the wave column before you build.
  • Building DFS lineups too early. The model's projections sharpen as the official entry list firms up — usually two to three days before the first round. An early look can miss late withdrawals. Check your DFS tab close to first tee.
  • Pressing when the Value tab is empty. Some weeks the book is sharp across every qualifying market. When the tab posts nothing, that's a signal, not a glitch. We'd rather sit out a week than stretch a thin edge into a play.

Golf board — FAQ

What is strokes gained and why does the golf model use it?

Strokes gained measures how a player performs relative to the rest of the field on every shot — off the tee, from the fairway, around the green, and on the putting surface. Unlike scoring average, it adjusts for the course and the competition, so a +2.0 SG rating means the same thing at Augusta as it does at a smaller event. That consistency makes it the most predictive skill metric in golf — and it's why MatchWiz uses DataGolf's SG ratings as the foundation for every win probability and finish-odds projection.

What's on the Value tab and when does a play qualify?

The Value tab shows spots where our model's estimated probability exceeds the book's implied probability by at least 1.5 percentage points, after stripping out the vig. Those plays are almost always in the finish markets — top-5, top-10, top-20 — where books price more loosely than the outright winner. If no plays clear that threshold this week, the tab says so. We'd rather post nothing than stretch a thin edge into a play.

How do the round-by-round group picks work?

Before each round, the Groups tab shows a pick for every 2-ball and 3-ball pairing: the player our model projects to post the lowest score in that group that round. The pick is locked before the group tees off and never revised. After the round it's graded — win, loss, or dead heat if players tie the low round. The running record, correct-pick rate, and units at the posted odds are all on the report card.

What's the difference between the Board and Leaderboard tabs?

The Board tab shows every player's live score alongside our win probability and finish odds — expand any card for the full hole-by-hole scorecard and that player's past results at this course. The Leaderboard tab is a sortable table view of the same data with more columns: sort by score, SG, or any finish-probability column. Use Board for card-level detail; use Leaderboard when you want to rank the full field by a specific metric.

How should I use MatchWiz Golf for PGA DFS?

Pick your book first — DFS · DK and DFS · FD are separate tabs, because the salaries, the scoring and the cap all differ (6 golfers under $50,000 on DraftKings, 6 under $60,000 on FanDuel). Each tab shows that site's own salary, DataGolf's projected points for that site's scoring, and a wave indicator for every priced player. Sort by value (points per $1,000) to find salary inefficiencies, and use the wave filter to tilt toward the better tee-time draw when conditions look like they'll split. The optimizer builds cap-legal lineups around any locks you set. One thing FanDuel is missing: DataGolf publishes no FanDuel ownership, so the GPP tilt there works off projection volatility alone.

Are these projections betting advice?

No. They're a research signal from a skill-based model, posted with the full graded record so you can judge them yourself. Golf is high-variance — a great player can lose on any given week — and any model can be wrong for any single event. The Value tab posts the best qualifying plays the model found; it doesn't guarantee them. Nothing here is a recommendation to wager. 21+, play responsibly.

Projections and Value plays are a research signal graded against real results — not betting advice. 21+, play responsibly (1-800-GAMBLER).