Today's matchup
Andrew is on the road against Arizona Diamondbacks on the Sunday, August 23, 2026 slate. He shows up on 6 boards — outs recorded (92.4/100, #3), walks allowed (50.9/100, #9), earned runs (32/100, #6), fantasy points (14.5/100, #8). We've got him at 16.4 on the outs recorded board. That's one of the stronger spots on the board today. Open any board row for the full breakdown of what's driving it.
Season line
26 starts, 6-8, 4.07 ERA, 1.40 WHIP, 139.1 innings. He's struck out 108 over that span, against 66 walks. This is the baseline the matchup adjusts from — the model starts here and then asks what the specific lineup he's facing does to strikeout arms, how the park plays, and how deep he's likely to go.
He throws left-handed
Andrew is a left-hander, and that matters more for a starter than it does for most hitters. Lineups get built specifically to attack lefties — managers stack right-handed bats against them — so the lineup he draws on a given night swings his projection further than a righty's would. The model prices the actual lineup rather than a season-long rate for exactly that reason. A stacked righty lineup is the spot where his strikeout projection comes down hardest.
His last 5 starts
Andrew has 18 strikeouts in 28.3 innings across his last 5 starts, a 5.7 K/9, with a 4.76 ERA over that stretch and 16 walks. Strikeouts are the one pitcher market where our model has found real, graded room — projected workload and the specific lineup he draws move that number more than a season-long rate does. Start-by-start detail is in the log below.
Strikeouts and control
Andrew has 108 strikeouts and 66 walks in 139.3 innings this season — 7.0 K/9 against 4.3 BB/9, a 1.6-to-1 ratio. That walk rate is the risk in every projection on him. Free passes run up pitch counts, and a short outing caps the strikeout and outs numbers no matter how favourable the lineup looks. His floor is genuinely lower than his stuff suggests.
What his floor looks like
Andrew has made 26 starts this season, averaging 5.4 innings with a 4.07 ERA across them. In the 12 starts we hold detailed lines for, he got through five or more innings 10 times. That ratio is the honest read on his floor, and it's what separates an arm worth projecting on the outs board from one whose good starts are unpredictable enough that the market prices them better than we do.
How long he goes
Andrew is averaging 5.5 innings a start across his last 8 outings, with a high of 6.7 and about 94 pitches a night. He's not going deep, and that caps the strikeout and outs projections no matter how good the matchup looks — you can't strike out hitters you don't face. Expected batters faced is one of the bigger inputs to his score for exactly this reason.
His best start in the log
Andrew's high-water mark was Tuesday, July 7, 2026 against PHI: 8 strikeouts over 6.0 innings, 3 earned runs. One start doesn't set a projection — the model works off the blend of his recent work against the specific lineup in front of him — but it does show the ceiling when the matchup lines up.
Where he lands across our boards
Andrew was scored on 6 boards in that matchup, and the spread is the interesting part: outs recorded graded 92.4/100 while strikeouts came in at 0/100. Same player, same game, same opposing arm — different questions. A spread that wide usually means the matchup favours one kind of outcome over another, and it's the clearest argument for reading the board that matches what you actually care about.
How the model reads him
Every arm on the slate goes through the same math, Andrew included. Opposing lineup, handedness, expected batters faced, park, weather — weighted, combined, and normalized 0–100. We keep the weighting to ourselves and re-tune it weekly on real results. What we don't keep is the record: every projection here is graded against the box score at the line the market offered.
What we'd flag
Three caveats worth carrying. Not every player gets a posted line — book coverage runs to about 87% for confirmed starters, so a blank line is the market's silence, not ours. Lineup changes land late enough to strand a projection published hours earlier. And judging any of this on a single night is meaningless; the model is tuned on hundreds of settled outcomes.