MatchWiz

StackLab

Pick a game from tonight's slate, lock the legs you like, and the model fills the rest. Every price is a real one a book is posting right now.

Book
Target payout
Legs
Same-game parlay0 legs · LAC @ LAL
—
Lock a leg, or hit Fill the rest
  • Nothing picked yet
Leg pool81 legs at FanDuel · 206 rungs folded in · 94 not simulated
PlayerPropPriceOursBookEV
Luka DoncicGAssists 9.5++26034%—+21.8%
Derrick Jones Jr.FPts+Reb 19.5++33028%—+19.5%
Luka DoncicGThrees 2.5+-31079%—+5.0%
Austin ReavesGReb+Ast 9.5+-11155%—+4.5%
Derrick Jones Jr.FPoints 10.5+-11456%50%+4.3%
Luka DoncicGThrees 3.5+-11554%—+1.7%
Austin ReavesGRebounds 3.5+-22570%—+1.1%
Luka DoncicGAssists 5.5+-37078%—-1.0%
Austin ReavesGThrees 3.5++39020%—-2.0%
Darius GarlandGAssists 5.5+-35076%—-2.3%
Austin ReavesGThrees 1.5+-21567%—-2.3%
Kris DunnGPts+Reb 11.5+-10849%49%-4.8%
Kris DunnGPts+Ast 9.5+-24067%—-5.0%
Kris DunnGPts+Reb 9.5+-20564%—-5.5%
Derrick Jones Jr.FPoints 9.5+-15657%—-5.8%
Kris DunnGPts+Ast 11.5+-11449%50%-7.2%
Kris DunnGAssists 5.5++25526%—-8.1%
Luka DoncicGPts+Ast 29.5+-90082%—-8.5%
Kris DunnGPts+Reb+Ast 14.5+-14854%—-9.3%
Kris DunnGPoints 4.5+-38072%—-9.4%
Austin ReavesGAssists 3.5+-36070%—-10.6%
Derrick Jones Jr.FThrees 1.5++20030%—-11.1%
Derrick Jones Jr.FPts+Reb 9.5+-52074%—-11.7%
Luka DoncicGPts+Reb+Ast 46.5+-12249%51%-11.7%
Derrick Jones Jr.FThrees 0.5+-25063%—-11.9%
Rui HachimuraFThrees 1.5+-25063%—-11.9%
Kris DunnGPts+Reb+Ast 9.5+-90078%—-13.7%
Luka DoncicGPts+Reb+Ast 39.5+-43069%—-14.8%
Isaiah JacksonFRebounds 3.5+-62073%—-15.4%
Darius GarlandGThrees 4.5++37018%—-15.4%
Luka DoncicGPts+Ast 34.5+-30063%—-15.7%
Luka DoncicGPoints 24.5+-52071%—-15.8%
Luka DoncicGDouble double+10840%—-17.4%
Derrick Jones Jr.FRebounds 3.5+-11844%—-17.9%
Austin ReavesGPts+Reb+Ast 34.5++13235%—-18.8%
Luka DoncicGPts+Reb 34.5+-29060%—-18.9%
Darius GarlandGThrees 1.5+-52068%—-18.9%
Luka DoncicGPts+Reb 29.5+-85072%—-19.5%
Luka DoncicGRebounds 5.5+-41065%—-19.5%
Kris DunnGAssists 3.5+-16249%—-20.1%
Austin ReavesGPts+Ast 19.5+-90072%—-20.4%
Kris DunnGThrees 0.5+-31060%—-20.6%
Darius GarlandGThrees 2.5+-16248%—-22.4%
Luka DoncicGPts+Reb+Ast 44.5+-18450%—-22.8%
Austin ReavesGPts+Reb+Ast 24.5+-67067%—-23.4%
Darius GarlandGPts+Reb 19.5+-80068%—-23.5%
Isaiah JacksonFPoints 4.5+-65066%—-23.7%
Austin ReavesGPoints 14.5+-100068%—-24.8%
Austin ReavesGPts+Reb 19.5+-70065%—-25.7%
Kris DunnGThrees 1.5++16228%—-26.0%
Isaiah JacksonFRebounds 5.5+-14844%—-26.2%
Darius GarlandGPts+Ast 24.5+-65064%—-26.2%
Darius GarlandGAssists 7.5++10236%—-27.3%
Isaiah JacksonFPts+Reb 9.5+-65063%—-27.6%
Luka DoncicGPts+Reb 39.5+-12240%50%-27.7%
Austin ReavesGPts+Ast 27.5+-12540%52%-28.0%
Isaiah JacksonFPts+Reb 14.5+-13241%—-28.5%
Austin ReavesGPts+Reb 27.5+-10837%49%-29.4%
Kris DunnGReb+Ast 7.5+-14441%55%-30.2%
Rui HachimuraFPts+Reb 14.5+-100063%—-30.7%
Kris DunnGRebounds 3.5+-14240%—-31.8%
Darius GarlandGReb+Ast 9.5+-18444%—-32.1%
Luka DoncicGPts+Ast 39.5+-11837%50%-32.1%
Austin ReavesGPts+Ast 24.5+-25048%—-32.3%
Austin ReavesGPts+Reb+Ast 29.5+-20545%—-33.0%
Darius GarlandGPts+Reb+Ast 29.5+-39052%—-34.7%
Rui HachimuraFThrees 2.5++12828%—-35.2%
Austin ReavesGPts+Reb 24.5+-20543%—-35.5%
Darius GarlandGRebounds 3.5++13824%—-42.9%
Darius GarlandGReb+Ast 10.5+-11428%50%-47.4%
Darius GarlandGPts+Ast 29.5+-23034%—-51.2%
Rui HachimuraFRebounds 3.5+-65042%—-51.6%
Rui HachimuraFPts+Reb 19.5+-26035%—-52.1%
Darius GarlandGPts+Reb 24.5+-25034%—-52.4%
Darius GarlandGPts+Reb 29.5++10620%—-58.8%
Darius GarlandGPts+Reb+Ast 34.5+-15024%—-60.0%
Rui HachimuraFPts+Reb 24.5++12216%—-64.4%
Darius GarlandGPts+Ast 33.5+-10618%48%-65.0%
Darius GarlandGPts+Reb+Ast 36.5+-11018%49%-65.6%
Rui HachimuraFRebounds 5.5+-13219%—-67.4%
Darius GarlandGDouble double+2656%—-78.1%

One leg per player. Three rungs of the same man's ladder are the same bet three times — they win and lose together, and no book will take them in one slip. You get his best rung in each price band rather than every rung, for the same reason. Book is the de-vigged market price, or a dash where the market is quoted one way only and the hold can't be stripped out.

Why the number isn't a multiply

A multiply is wrong in basketball, and it's wrong in both directions at once. Which one you get depends on whether your legs are one player or two.

Stack one man's night and the legs ride together. We measured it on 79,638 real player-games across three seasons: his points and his assists both going over hits 28.7% more often than the multiply says, and his rebounds and made field goals 36.2% more often. Pair his points with his points-rebounds-assists and it's 92.4% — the same night counted twice. A multiply prices that slip as a much longer shot than it is.

Two teammates fight instead. One ball, about a hundred possessions, so a teammate's big night comes partly out of yours: two players both going over on points lands 4.7% less often than the product, and on made field goals 4.2% less. Here the multiply flatters the slip, which is the trap, because that's the stack that looks diversified.

Opponents barely move at all — within half a percent of the plain product on points and rebounds. The pace both teams play lifts both benches a little, and that's the whole of it.

So StackLab doesn't multiply. Every game here is simulated thousands of times off the players' own game logs, and each posted line carries a record of which runs it hit. The chance a whole slip lands is the share of runs where every leg hit at once.

What the EV number means

EV is our win probability times what the slip pays, minus one. Positive means our model makes the parlay worth more than it costs. Negative means the book is ahead of us, and that's the common answer — it should be. Books hold a margin on every leg, and a parlay multiplies it.

Which is why the leg-count strip matters. Inside a fixed payout band, each extra leg multiplies the same hold again, so EV falls as the count rises. The strip shows that shape on the pool in front of you.

Fill the rest won't pick a leg we can't stand behind. 9 of the 14 legs we can compare sit more than 10 points from the book's own number, and our pricer calls a gap that size a stale line or an injury we don't know about rather than an opportunity. The model is unbiased on average here and wide game to game, so those are the rows where it's likeliest to be the one that's wrong — and ranking by EV would otherwise reach for them first.

They're still on the board, and you can still lock one. That's your call to make with the number in front of you; what the model won't do is choose it for you and call the result an edge.

Every leg here is one a book is quoting

A leg only appears when a sportsbook is posting that exact line and we hold simulated runs behind it. The percentage beside a player is the same one his prop board shows — one model, one number, two pages.

The runs come from his own games. A player's line is priced off the shape of his last 40-plus box scores rather than a bell curve, because a counting stat isn't shaped like one, and the simulation draws whole box scores rather than one stat at a time. That's why his points and his rebounds move together by exactly as much as they really do.

We also publish how the model does against the market, and on NBA player props the market wins. Nothing here is sold as a pick. It's our number next to the book's, and a payout that's honest about what the legs do to each other.