MatchWiz

Chicago Bulls vs Boston Celtics

The quarters and both box scores, and how the model saw it.

Chicago Bulls logoBulls111Boston Celtics logoCeltics125FinalTD Garden

Scoring by quarter

Final
ScoringQ1Q2Q3Q4T
Chicago Bulls logoBulls25242537111
Boston Celtics logoCeltics44342126125

Box score

Final

Chicago Bulls logoChicago Bulls

PlayerMINPTSREBASTFG3PTFTORSTLBLKTOPF
Caleb WilsonF3123547-166-113-611215
Norman PowellG3116234-111-57-810004
Jalen SmithF2751212-80-51-240214
Josh GiddeyG2513454-82-53-410041
Matas BuzelisF2014515-112-52-210024
Tre JonesG2012444-100-14-624110
Isaac OkoroF186322-51-41-100113
Buddy HieldG175312-51-30-031011
Noa EssengueF1610403-71-33-530023
Tobe AwakaF122710-00-02-631024
Leonard MillerF112211-50-40-010003
Jordan HawkinsG60000-20-10-000000
Jaylin SellersG33011-31-20-000001
Zach CollinsF20000-10-10-000010
Team—111512435-9215-5026-4020761633

Did not play Patrick Williams coach's decision

Boston Celtics logoBoston Celtics

PlayerMINPTSREBASTFG3PTFTORSTLBLKTOPF
Payton PritchardG3530339-173-99-912035
Jayson TatumF3526779-202-76-800045
Paul GeorgeF2718687-152-72-213022
Derrick WhiteG269244-61-20-002011
Baylor ScheiermanG232331-30-10-021000
Neemias QuetaC2013603-50-07-1011111
Mitchell RobinsonC1911404-40-03-520102
Sam HauserF186322-42-40-000001
Hugo GonzalezG150200-10-00-001004
Jordan WalshG112201-30-20-010004
Luka GarzaC75111-30-03-410002
Ron Harper Jr.G30000-00-00-000010
Chris Cenac Jr.F23201-10-01-200020
Team—125412842-8210-3231-4091021527

Did not play Mike Conley coach's decision

Team stats

Final
BullsCeltics
35-92FG42-82
38.0%FG%51.2%
15-503PT10-32
30.0%3PT%31.3%
26-40FT31-40
51Rebounds41
20Off reb9
24Assists28
7Steals10
6Blocks2
16Turnovers15
33Fouls27

105.6 possessions each, estimated off the box the standard way. Bulls on 1 day, Celtics on 2 days.

What the model says

Friday, October 30
ProjectedBulls 107.2 · Celtics 122.8
Our lineCeltics −15.6
Total230.0
Win probCeltics 93% · Bulls 7%

These are projections, not picks. We publish our number next to the market's and grade it in the open — on game markets the book has beaten us in every sport we've measured, and we say so rather than dressing a projection up as an edge.