MatchWiz

Cleveland Cavaliers vs Oklahoma City Thunder

The quarters and both box scores, and how the model saw it.

Cleveland Cavaliers logoCavaliers116Oklahoma City Thunder logoThunder124FinalPaycom Center

Scoring by quarter

Final
ScoringQ1Q2Q3Q4T
Cleveland Cavaliers logoCavaliers20243042116
Oklahoma City Thunder logoThunder37232836124

Box score

Final

Cleveland Cavaliers logoCleveland Cavaliers

PlayerMINPTSREBASTFG3PTFTORSTLBLKTOPF
James HardenG3519965-163-86-610231
Donovan MitchellG33273610-175-102-201025
Evan MobleyC32161037-151-51-230323
Sam MerrillG2610713-72-42-221105
Mario HezonjaF2312815-102-60-020022
Tyrese ProctorG2211104-72-31-101003
Meleek ThomasG189103-93-70-001026
Tristan EnarunaF164412-70-30-011001
Craig Porter Jr.G140110-00-00-011111
Thomas BryantC138001-41-35-600002
Jarrett AllenC70100-10-00-000000
Team—116451940-9319-4917-1910671429

Did not play Riley Minix coach's decision

Oklahoma City Thunder logoOklahoma City Thunder

PlayerMINPTSREBASTFG3PTFTORSTLBLKTOPF
Shai Gilgeous-AlexanderG35425811-265-1115-1910142
Ajay MitchellG3223749-171-34-601011
Kenrich WilliamsG2913425-93-50-000012
Isaiah HartensteinC2631241-20-01-212002
Micah PeavyG262911-60-20-041015
Aday MaraC259524-60-01-210302
Jared McCainG259103-111-62-201022
Bennett StirtzG2216116-94-70-002001
Alex CarusoG207431-31-24-410011
Josh DixG00000-00-00-000000
Team—124472541-8915-3627-358741118

Did not play Brooks Barnhizer coach's decision · Dalen Terry coach's decision

Team stats

Final
CavaliersThunder
40-93FG41-89
43.0%FG%46.1%
19-493PT15-36
38.8%3PT%41.7%
17-19FT27-35
45Rebounds47
10Off reb8
19Assists25
6Steals7
7Blocks4
14Turnovers11
29Fouls18

106.4 possessions each, estimated off the box the standard way.

What the model says

Wednesday, November 4
ProjectedCavaliers 111.1 · Thunder 119.1
Our lineThunder −7.9
Total230.2
Win probThunder 79% · Cavaliers 21%

These are projections, not picks. We publish our number next to the market's and grade it in the open — on game markets the book has beaten us in every sport we've measured, and we say so rather than dressing a projection up as an edge.