Last scored matchup
Jeremy isn't on today's slate. He was last scored yesterday, at home against Arizona Diamondbacks on Sunday, September 6, 2026, where he landed on singles (62.6/100), hits (62/100), h+r+rbi (54.8/100). This page refreshes with new projections as soon as he's back in a lineup.
He's in a cold stretch
Jeremy is 7-for-40 (.175) across his last 10 games, down from .267 on the season. Slumps this size are mostly noise at this sample — 40 at-bats is a fortnight, not a trend — and the model treats it that way, discounting the cold run rather than writing him off. If the matchup underneath is good, he'll still grade well here. That's a feature, and sometimes it's wrong.
What kind of hitter he is
Jeremy has 17 home runs and 31 extra-base hits in 360 at-bats this season. That profile is why he grades better on the total-bases and home-run boards than his batting average alone would suggest — those boards reward damage, not just contact. Park and weather matter more for a hitter like him too, and both feed the score.
He's a right-handed bat
Jeremy hits from the right side, so the platoon math runs the other way from a lefty's. Right-handed bats face right-handed pitching most of the time, meaning his baseline is built against the harder side and a left-handed starter is the upgrade. That's why a righty's score can jump on a day nothing else about the matchup changed. The model weighs his rates against the specific handedness he's drawing rather than a blended season number, which is where a lot of the day-to-day movement in his score comes from.
Floor and ceiling
Jeremy has recorded at least one hit in 64 of 89 games he's batted in — 72% — with 24 multi-hit games among them. That's about average — most regulars land somewhere near it.
Home and away
Jeremy is hitting .292 at home (49-for-168) and .245 on the road (47-for-192) across the season. There's not much in it, which is the normal case. Home-road splits get talked about far more than they hold up.
Against Arizona Diamondbacks
Jeremy is 1-for-13 (.077) against Arizona Diamondbacks in our log, over 3 games. Worth knowing, worth not over-reading. 13 at-bats against one club is a tiny sample, and the model treats it as a minor input next to what that pitching staff actually allows to his handedness. Batter-versus-pitcher history is the most quoted number in baseball and one of the least predictive.
His best game in the log
Jeremy's biggest night was Sunday, August 30, 2026 at NYM — 2-for-5 with 1 homer, 2 driven in. That's the ceiling, not the expectation. The projection you'll see on a board is closer to his typical game than his best one, which is the whole point of projecting rather than remembering.
How our calls on Jeremy have graded
We've ranked Jeremy a top-20 hitter matchup 52 times this season. He got a hit in 33 of them — 63%. That's the model reading him well, and it's the number we'd point to if you asked why we keep ranking him. It's also a season-sized sample on one player, which is smaller than it sounds; don't extrapolate it into a promise about tonight.
Where he lands across our boards
Jeremy was scored on 12 boards in that matchup, and the spread is the interesting part: singles graded 62.6/100 while triples came in at 17.1/100. Same player, same game, same opposing arm — different questions. A spread that wide usually means the matchup favours one kind of outcome over another, and it's the clearest argument for reading the board that matches what you actually care about.
How the model reads him
Jeremy's score rates the spot in front of him, not the name on the jersey. It weighs his rates against the kind of arm he's facing — handedness matters a lot — set against what that pitcher and his bullpen give up, then adjusts for expected playing time, park, weather, and recent form, normalized 0–100 across the slate. The weighting is proprietary and re-tuned weekly; the grading is public, and that's the half that proves anything.
What we'd flag
Books don't price every player — coverage tops out around 87% even for confirmed starters, so "no line" here usually means no book posted one rather than a gap in our data. Lineups change late, and an afternoon projection can be stale by first pitch. And the model is tuned across hundreds of graded outcomes, so one game tells you nothing about whether it's working.