Last scored matchup
Leo isn't on today's slate. He was last scored yesterday, away at Houston Astros on Friday, August 14, 2026, where he landed on walks (54.1/100), rbis (23.1/100), triples (19.9/100). This page refreshes with new projections as soon as he's back in a lineup.
What kind of hitter he is
Leo strikes out a lot — 36 strikeouts in 99 at-bats, roughly 36%. That cuts both ways in our numbers. It drags his floor on the hits board, since he needs contact to get there. But it barely dents the power boards, where one swing settles it. Against a high-strikeout arm his score will fall further than a contact hitter's would.
He bats from both sides
Leo is a switch-hitter, which changes how the model reads every one of his matchups. Most hitters carry a real platoon penalty — a lefty bat facing a good lefty arm is a materially worse spot, and the score drops accordingly. Leo takes the favourable side almost every night, so he doesn't collect that penalty. What moves his number instead is the quality of the arm rather than its handedness, and how the two sides of his own swing actually compare, which is rarely as balanced as the switch-hitter label suggests.
Floor and ceiling
Leo has recorded at least one hit in 13 of 36 games he's batted in — 36% — with 1 multi-hit game among them. That's a boom-or-bust profile. He'll carry a game outright and then go quiet for three, so his hits-board score tends to sit below hitters with worse power and better contact.
Home and away
Leo is hitting .149 at home (10-for-67) and .125 on the road (4-for-32) across the season. There's not much in it, which is the normal case. Home-road splits get talked about far more than they hold up.
No graded record on him yet
We haven't ranked Leo a top-20 hitter matchup often enough this season to have a record worth publishing — not once so far. He's appeared in 40 graded games, so the log below is real; there just isn't a track record on our calls to show. It'll build here if the matchups start landing his way.
Where he lands across our boards
Leo was scored on 12 boards in that matchup, and the spread is the interesting part: walks graded 54.1/100 while runs came in at 0/100. Same player, same game, same opposing arm — different questions. A spread that wide usually means the matchup favours one kind of outcome over another, and it's the clearest argument for reading the board that matches what you actually care about.
How the model reads him
Leo's score rates the spot in front of him, not the name on the jersey. It weighs his rates against the kind of arm he's facing — handedness matters a lot — set against what that pitcher and his bullpen give up, then adjusts for expected playing time, park, weather, and recent form, normalized 0–100 across the slate. The weighting is proprietary and re-tuned weekly; the grading is public, and that's the half that proves anything.
What we'd flag
Books don't price every player — coverage tops out around 87% even for confirmed starters, so "no line" here usually means no book posted one rather than a gap in our data. Lineups change late, and an afternoon projection can be stale by first pitch. And the model is tuned across hundreds of graded outcomes, so one game tells you nothing about whether it's working. For Leo specifically, his sample is small (99 at-bats logged), and we don't have a meaningful graded record on him yet.