Last scored matchup
Nick isn't on today's slate. He was last scored 7 days ago, away at New York Yankees on Wednesday, September 30, 2026, where he landed on hits (63.7/100), doubles (60/100), singles (51/100). This page refreshes with new projections as soon as he's back in a lineup.
Recent form
Nick is 9-for-37 (.243) over his last 10 games, in line with his .258 season line. No hot streak to fade, no slump to buy — the matchup is doing the work in his score, which is the normal case. The full game log is below.
He bats from both sides
Nick is a switch-hitter, which changes how the model reads every one of his matchups. Most hitters carry a real platoon penalty — a lefty bat facing a good lefty arm is a materially worse spot, and the score drops accordingly. Nick takes the favourable side almost every night, so he doesn't collect that penalty. What moves his number instead is the quality of the arm rather than its handedness, and how the two sides of his own swing actually compare, which is rarely as balanced as the switch-hitter label suggests.
Floor and ceiling
Nick has recorded at least one hit in 44 of 65 games he's batted in — 68% — with 17 multi-hit games among them. That's about average — most regulars land somewhere near it.
Home and away
Nick is hitting .330 at home (38-for-115) and .192 on the road (24-for-125) across the season. That's a real-looking split, and it's the kind of thing that's usually part park and part noise. The model doesn't apply a blanket home-road adjustment — it prices the actual ballpark he's standing in, which is the part that carries signal.
How our calls on Nick have graded
In the 11 games where we ranked Nick a top-20 hitter matchup, he recorded a hit 6 times — 55%. That's a thin sample and we'd treat it as such. Every one of those calls was graded against the real box score, misses included.
Where he lands across our boards
Nick was scored on 12 boards in that matchup, and the spread is the interesting part: hits graded 63.7/100 while stolen bases came in at 6.4/100. Same player, same game, same opposing arm — different questions. A spread that wide usually means the matchup favours one kind of outcome over another, and it's the clearest argument for reading the board that matches what you actually care about.
How the model reads him
Take the name off Nick and the model still produces the same number, because it's scoring the matchup rather than the player. His splits against this handedness, what the opposing starter and bullpen actually allow, how many plate appearances he's likely to get, the park, the weather, how he's swinging lately. All of it lands on a 0–100 scale against everyone else playing today. We don't publish how it's weighted. We publish every result it produces.
What we'd flag
Three caveats worth carrying. Not every player gets a posted line — book coverage runs to about 87% for confirmed starters, so a blank line is the market's silence, not ours. Lineup changes land late enough to strand a projection published hours earlier. And judging any of this on a single night is meaningless; the model is tuned on hundreds of settled outcomes.