MatchWiz

Saint Peter's Peacocks vs Pittsburgh Panthers

The quarters and both box scores, and how the model saw it.

Saint Peter's Peacocks logoSaint Peter's52Pittsburgh Panthers logoPitt81FinalPetersen Events Center

Scoring by quarter

Final
ScoringQ1Q2Q3Q4T
Saint Peter's Peacocks logoSaint Peter's1113121652
Pittsburgh Panthers logoPitt1623271581

Box score

Final

Saint Peter's Peacocks logoSaint Peter's Peacocks

PlayerMINPTSREBASTFG3PTFTORSTLBLKTOPF
Sierra PatricioG356403-100-40-021104
Carys RoyC3118719-120-00-021403
Ineivi PlataG312531-60-30-0000102
Ebere EgbirikaG239543-51-22-421043
Aniyah NealG232401-50-20-010041
Nikola ZdenkovaG163131-41-40-000121
Jada MillsG146322-62-50-010000
Lamaria EstridgeF114011-31-31-201024
Eszter TuriG90200-00-00-010012
Sophie StauntonG50000-40-30-000010
Bree RileyG12001-10-00-000011
Soreya YilmazG10010-00-00-000000
Team—52381522-565-263-613462621

Did not play Alexandra Wilson dnp · Emily O'Connell dnp · Layla Christopher dnp

Pittsburgh Panthers logoPittsburgh Panthers

PlayerMINPTSREBASTFG3PTFTORSTLBLKTOPF
Taryn BarbotG4025349-223-104-626010
Taylor BarbotG376472-100-32-413023
Meredith VennerC2822908-120-06-771201
Maysen HillG2611514-62-31-221013
Alancia RamseyF256701-40-14-614133
Jamisen HillG162301-70-50-024111
Ande'a CherisierC126403-50-00-020003
Macie ArznerG102301-30-10-011001
Madison CrawfordG31100-20-11-210000
Jazmyne BynumG30010-10-00-000000
Team—81421329-725-2418-2719204815

Did not play Avery Watkins dnp · CeCe Legaspi dnp

Team stats

Final
Saint Peter'sPitt
22-56FG29-72
39.3%FG%40.3%
5-263PT5-24
19.2%3PT%20.8%
3-6FT18-27
38Rebounds42
13Off reb19
15Assists13
4Steals20
6Blocks4
26Turnovers8
21Fouls15

72.3 possessions each, estimated off the box the standard way.

What the model says

Tuesday, November 3
ProjectedSaint Peter's 53.8 · Pitt 67.7
Our linePitt −13.9
Total121.5
Win probPitt 88% · Saint Peter's 13%

These are projections, not picks. We publish our number next to the market's and grade it in the open — on game markets the book has beaten us in every sport we've measured, and we say so rather than dressing a projection up as an edge.