Best MLB Total Bases Matchups — Thursday, June 25, 2026
Top total bases spot: Pete Crow-Armstrong
Pete Crow-Armstrong (CHC) tops the board at 100, facing RHP Freddy Peralta. The lefty is racking up bases at .500 TB/PA against righties this year — and .932 over the last two weeks, an elite bat that turns into a total base in about 55% of his trips. And Freddy Peralta has been getting squared up by righties lately — .591 total bases per batter faced. The bullpen behind him is roughly average to that side. He's hitting in a spot worth about 4.7 trips, so the volume's there. He's owned Freddy Peralta too — .333 across 15 career trips. It all sets up in a neutral park.
The rest of the top of the board
- Paul Goldschmidt (NYY) (83) vs LHP Connelly Early: a strong bat at .470 into an arm getting squared up by the same side (.500).
- Bryce Harper (PHI) (83) vs RHP Cade Cavalli: an excellent bat at .494 into an arm vulnerable to the same side (.400).
- Kyle Schwarber (PHI) (79) vs RHP Cade Cavalli: a strong bat at .457 into an arm vulnerable to the same side (.400).
- Yordan Alvarez (HOU) (74) vs RHP Troy Melton: an excellent bat at .503 into an arm getting squared up by the same side (.515).
- Dillon Dingler (DET) (70) vs RHP Tatsuya Imai: an excellent bat at .500 into an arm getting squared up by the same side (.556).
- Matt Chapman (SF) (70) vs LHP Jeffrey Springs: a league-average bat at .368 into an arm getting squared up by the same side (.800).
- Casey Schmitt (SF) (69) vs LHP Jeffrey Springs: a solid bat at .400 into an arm getting squared up by the same side (.800).
Arms giving up extra bases today
- LHP Jeffrey Springs has been getting squared up by lefties — .481 total bases per batter faced. Bats to target: Matt Chapman (SF), Casey Schmitt (SF), and Bryce Eldridge (SF).
- RHP Freddy Peralta has been getting squared up by righties — .431 total bases per batter faced. Bats to target: Pete Crow-Armstrong (CHC), Michael Busch (CHC), and Michael Conforto (CHC).
- RHP Kevin Gausman has been vulnerable to righties — .409 total bases per batter faced. Bats to target: Wyatt Langford (TEX), Brandon Nimmo (TEX), and Jake Burger (TEX).
- LHP Cristopher Sánchez has been vulnerable to lefties — .404 total bases per batter faced. Bats to target: Curtis Mead (WSH), Dylan Crews (WSH), and James Wood (WSH).
Platoon edges to target
- Pete Crow-Armstrong (CHC) — lefty bat vs RHP, .500 against righties this year.
- Paul Goldschmidt (NYY) — righty bat vs LHP, .635 against lefties this year.
- Bryce Harper (PHI) — lefty bat vs RHP, .528 against righties this year.
- Kyle Schwarber (PHI) — lefty bat vs RHP, .495 against righties this year.
- Yordan Alvarez (HOU) — lefty bat vs RHP, .528 against righties this year.
How it played out
8 of the top 10 total bases matchups landed at least one total base. Top play Pete Crow-Armstrong finished with 3 total bases. We post the result next to every projection so you can grade the board yourself — and so the model gets re-tuned against what actually happened.
How to read these total bases matchups
Each score (0–100) starts with the hitter's total bases per plate appearance against the hand he's facing — weighted toward the last two weeks, then the season, then a two-year baseline. Then it layers in the bullpen, his spot in the order, and park and weather. Higher means more of it points his way. It's context, not a lock — a great spot still goes 0-for-4 sometimes, and a tough one runs into one. The edge is in stacking the odds, and since we grade every board, you can see how often the top of the list delivers.
What the total bases board is
The Total Bases board projects how many bases a hitter racks up vs the posted total-bases line. One statistical model scores every matchup on the slate the same way — a star and a backup judged on the matchup in front of them, not their name — and every number is graded against the real box score once the games go final.
How the model gets its number
It isn't a gut call or a name game. The projection is built from a few things:
- His extra-base pop vs this arm.
- The park.
- Recent contact quality.
Those pieces combine into one number, and the model re-tunes itself weekly against how its past calls actually landed.
Is there a betting edge here?
Total bases grades right at break-even even when we tune it to the hilt — the book prices the marginal leans efficiently. Transparency board.
How to use it
See who the model projects for extra-base damage; no systematic edge to bet.
Everything here is a research signal from the model, graded in public — not betting advice, and no outcome is guaranteed.
Learn more: How the model works · The picks story · Today's plays