Last scored matchup
Nick isn't on today's slate. He was last scored 7 days ago, at home against Chicago White Sox on Wednesday, September 30, 2026, where he landed on doubles (80.8/100), singles (41.8/100), total bases (32.4/100). This page refreshes with new projections as soon as he's back in a lineup.
He's a right-handed bat
Nick hits from the right side, so the platoon math runs the other way from a lefty's. Right-handed bats face right-handed pitching most of the time, meaning his baseline is built against the harder side and a left-handed starter is the upgrade. That's why a righty's score can jump on a day nothing else about the matchup changed. The model weighs his rates against the specific handedness he's drawing rather than a blended season number, which is where a lot of the day-to-day movement in his score comes from.
Floor and ceiling
Nick has recorded at least one hit in 30 of 55 games he's batted in — 55% — with 7 multi-hit games among them. That's a boom-or-bust profile. He'll carry a game outright and then go quiet for three, so his hits-board score tends to sit below hitters with worse power and better contact.
Home and away
Nick is hitting .197 at home (15-for-76) and .393 on the road (24-for-61) across the season. That's a real-looking split, and it's the kind of thing that's usually part park and part noise. The model doesn't apply a blanket home-road adjustment — it prices the actual ballpark he's standing in, which is the part that carries signal.
No graded record on him yet
We haven't ranked Nick a top-20 hitter matchup often enough this season to have a record worth publishing — 3 times so far. He's appeared in 86 graded games, so the log below is real; there just isn't a track record on our calls to show. It'll build here if the matchups start landing his way.
Where he lands across our boards
Nick was scored on 12 boards in that matchup, and the spread is the interesting part: doubles graded 80.8/100 while home runs came in at 0/100. Same player, same game, same opposing arm — different questions. A spread that wide usually means the matchup favours one kind of outcome over another, and it's the clearest argument for reading the board that matches what you actually care about.
How the model reads him
Nick's score rates the spot in front of him, not the name on the jersey. It weighs his rates against the kind of arm he's facing — handedness matters a lot — set against what that pitcher and his bullpen give up, then adjusts for expected playing time, park, weather, and recent form, normalized 0–100 across the slate. The weighting is proprietary and re-tuned weekly; the grading is public, and that's the half that proves anything.
What we'd flag
Books don't price every player — coverage tops out around 87% even for confirmed starters, so "no line" here usually means no book posted one rather than a gap in our data. Lineups change late, and an afternoon projection can be stale by first pitch. And the model is tuned across hundreds of graded outcomes, so one game tells you nothing about whether it's working. For Nick specifically, we don't have a meaningful graded record on him yet.