Loading the board.
Loading the board.
Who is most likely to find the end zone this week — touchdown odds driven by goal-line work, not just big-play ability.
DET vs NYJSun 1 PM63%−1723TD
SF vs ARISun 4 PM62%−1621TD
IND vs HOUSun 1 PM56%−128
MIA vs KCSun 1 PM55%−122
BAL @ DALSun 4 PM54%−1162TD
DAL vs BALSun 4 PM53%−1141TD
SEA @ WSHSun 1 PM53%−1142TD
ATL @ GBThu 8 PM53%−1132TD
KC @ MIASun 1 PM53%−1122TD
BUF vs LACSun 1 PM53%−1121TD
SEA @ WSHSun 1 PM49%+103
NYJ @ DETSun 1 PM42%+138
LAR @ DENSun 8 PM41%+142
LAC @ BUFSun 1 PM41%+142
PHI @ CHIMon 8 PM41%+144
CHI vs PHIMon 8 PM40%+148
NYG vs TENSun 1 PM40%+150
CLE vs CARSun 1 PM39%+155
ARI @ SFSun 4 PM39%+1591TD
HOU @ INDSun 1 PM38%+166
DAL vs BALSun 4 PM37%+168
PHI @ CHIMon 8 PM37%+172
PIT vs CINSun 1 PM36%+175
CAR @ CLESun 1 PM36%+180How often our number landed on the right side of the line a book actually posted. Every quoted line counts, not just the big disagreements — and a push settles as neither. There are no units here: two seasons of walk-forward say these lines are efficient, so we grade accuracy and don't claim an edge we can't show. Tiers are nested and re-ranked every week, so a Top 5 line is also a Top 10 one. They rank the players a book actually quoted, not every name on the board. Green means it beat what picking a side with no model at all would have scored.
Every number here comes from the same drive-level simulation as the matchups board, so a player's line and his team's projected points are the same game. Not betting advice — 21+, play responsibly (1-800-GAMBLER).