Loading the board.
Loading the board.
The chance each starting quarterback throws a pick this week. Books post this at 0.5, so what matters is whether he throws one at all — not how many he averages.
NE vs LVSun 1 PM57%
LAR vs BUFMon 8 PM56%
LAC vs DENSun 4 PM55%1
SEA vs SFSun 4 PM53%2
NYG @ WSHSun 1 PM51%
TB @ DALThu 8 PM49%
PIT vs INDSun 1 PM49%
IND @ PITSun 1 PM49%
LV @ NESun 1 PM49%
ARI vs DETSun 4 PM48%1
CIN @ MIASun 1 PM46%
GB vs CHISun 1 PM45%
PHI @ JAXSun 9 AM45%
ATL vs BALSun 8 PM44%
DEN @ LACSun 4 PM44%
MIN @ NOSun 1 PM43%
DAL vs TBThu 8 PM42%2
BUF @ LARMon 8 PM42%1
BAL @ ATLSun 8 PM42%
JAX vs PHISun 9 AM42%1
NO vs MINSun 1 PM41%2
TEN vs HOUSun 1 PM40%1
MIA vs CINSun 1 PM39%2
CLE @ NYJSun 1 PM36%
SF @ SEASun 4 PM35%1
WSH vs NYGSun 1 PM33%
DET @ ARISun 4 PM31%
HOU @ TENSun 1 PM30%
NYJ vs CLESun 1 PM29%We haven't graded this board against a walk-forward run yet, so read it as a projection, not as an edge. What we have measured is the market: across 1,563 posted 0.5 lines from 2023 to 2025, betting every over blind returned −6.3% and every under −2.3%, both at the best price of five books. Both sides lose to the hold — this is a tight market. It's also why the number above is a chance and not an average: a quarterback averages 0.67 picks a game but throws one in only about 48% of starts, so an average read against a 0.5 line is an over on nearly every passer in the league.
How often our number landed on the right side of the line a book actually posted. Every quoted line counts, not just the big disagreements — and a push settles as neither. There are no units here: two seasons of walk-forward say these lines are efficient, so we grade accuracy and don't claim an edge we can't show. Green means it beat what picking a side with no model at all would have scored.
Every number here comes from the same drive-level simulation as the matchups board, so a player's line and his team's projected points are the same game. Not betting advice — 21+, play responsibly (1-800-GAMBLER).