Loading the board.
Loading the board.
The chance each starting quarterback throws a pick this week. Books post this at 0.5, so what matters is whether he throws one at all — not how many he averages.
NE @ BUFSun 1 PM61%1
LAC @ SEASun 4 PM53%2
LAR @ PHISun 1 PM53%2
TB vs GBSun 1 PM50%2
SEA vs LACSun 4 PM50%1
IND @ WSHSun 9 AM49%1
PIT @ CLEThu 8 PM49%2
MIN vs MIASun 4 PM49%
PHI vs LARSun 1 PM47%
LV vs KCSun 4 PM47%1
ATL @ NOMon 8 PM46%
NO vs ATLMon 8 PM46%
JAX @ CINSun 1 PM45%
CAR vs DETSun 8 PM45%
GB @ TBSun 1 PM44%1
NYG vs ARISun 1 PM44%2
KC @ LVSun 4 PM44%
CHI vs NYJSun 1 PM42%1
MIA @ MINSun 4 PM41%
TEN @ BALSun 1 PM40%1
CIN vs JAXSun 1 PM39%2
SF vs DENSun 4 PM38%
DAL @ HOUSun 1 PM38%
BUF vs NESun 1 PM38%1
ARI @ NYGSun 1 PM38%3
WSH vs INDSun 9 AM37%
BAL vs TENSun 1 PM37%
CLE vs PITThu 8 PM36%1
HOU vs DALSun 1 PM33%We haven't graded this board against a walk-forward run yet, so read it as a projection, not as an edge. What we have measured is the market: across 1,563 posted 0.5 lines from 2023 to 2025, betting every over blind returned −6.3% and every under −2.3%, both at the best price of five books. Both sides lose to the hold — this is a tight market. It's also why the number above is a chance and not an average: a quarterback averages 0.67 picks a game but throws one in only about 48% of starts, so an average read against a 0.5 line is an over on nearly every passer in the league.
How often our number landed on the right side of the line a book actually posted. Every quoted line counts, not just the big disagreements — and a push settles as neither. There are no units here: two seasons of walk-forward say these lines are efficient, so we grade accuracy and don't claim an edge we can't show. Green means it beat what picking a side with no model at all would have scored.
Every number here comes from the same drive-level simulation as the matchups board, so a player's line and his team's projected points are the same game. Not betting advice — 21+, play responsibly (1-800-GAMBLER).