Who has the best h+r+rbi matchup today (Tuesday, July 21, 2026)?

James Wood (WSH) — top of the board at 100, facing RHP the starter. A solid bat into a beatable arm is what pushes it to No. 1.

What are the best MLB h+r+rbi matchups today (Tuesday, July 21, 2026)?

The top h+r+rbi matchups on Tuesday, July 21, 2026: James Wood (100), Drake Baldwin (100), Shea Langeliers (100), Jake McCarthy (99), Luis García Jr. (96). The full board ranks every hitter in every game by h+r+rbi upside.

Did the top h+r+rbi matchup get a H+R+RBI on Tuesday, July 21, 2026?

Yes — James Wood got 5 H+R+RBI.

How is the h+r+rbi matchup score calculated?

It's a weighted read of the hitter's combined hits + runs + RBIs per plate appearance against the hand he's facing — the last two weeks, the current season, and a two-year baseline, with recent form counting most. Then it folds in the opposing bullpen, his expected plate appearances from the batting order, and park and weather. Scores are set 0–100 across the day's slate, so the best matchup is always 100.

What does H+R+RBI mean?

It adds a hitter's hits, runs scored, and runs batted in into one number — the books call it a combo prop. It rewards all-around production: a 2-hit night with a run and an RBI is 4. Per plate appearance, around .45 is league average.

What does the score actually mean?

Higher is better for the hitter. 80s and 90s mean the bat, the pitcher, and the park all line up. 40s and 50s mean it's neutral to tough. It's a ranking of how today's spots stack up against each other — not the odds of a H+R+RBI.

What's the confidence meter?

It's how much data is behind the call — sample size on both the hitter and the pitcher, plus whether the lineup's official. A high score with low confidence is a thinner read than the same score backed by a deep track record. It's not a probability of a H+R+RBI.

What is a platoon split (handedness split)?

Most hitters do better against the opposite hand — a lefty bat vs. a righty arm, and vice versa. That gap is the platoon split. The score leans hard on each hitter's rate against the hand he's facing today, which is why the same guy can rank very differently day to day.

What are park factors?

Parks aren't neutral. Dimensions, altitude, and weather make some easier to hit in than others. Above 1.00 bumps the score, below 1.00 trims it — same hitter, higher grade in a hitter's park than a pitcher's.

What do "2W", "SZN" and "2Y" mean?

The timeframes behind each rate: the last two weeks (recent form), the current season, and a trailing two years (a stable baseline). Recent form counts most, and small samples get pulled toward league average so a hot week doesn't fool the model.

What do "≈ est", "Due" and "Not starting" mean?

"≈ est" is a hitter we don't have splits for yet — a rookie or unmatched ID — shown at a league-baseline estimate instead of dropped. "Due" means he hasn't recorded a H+R+RBI in a while and profiles for regression. "Not starting" means he was projected but didn't make the official lineup, so he slides to the bottom where you can still look him up.

Can I use this for h+r+rbi props or DFS?

That's what it's built for — pre-slate research. The board surfaces which hitters have the best conditions today, and where one exists, we show the book's "1+ H+R+RBI" line so you can shop the price. We're not a sportsbook and we don't post picks — we show the matchup data, the line, and the result. (Best-price and all-book odds are a Pro feature.)

How accurate is the model?

We grade every board against real results, and the top of the board lands a H+R+RBI a lot more often than the slate as a whole. Weights get re-tuned weekly against actual outcomes on a held-out split, and since results sit next to projections, you can audit the hit rate yourself on any past date.

When do lineups update?

Projected lineups (marked "Proj") come from each team's last game. Official lineups usually drop about two hours before first pitch, and the board updates itself as they post. Batting order is a big driver, so it's worth a second look mid-afternoon — rankings shift as lineups lock.

Yes. The full board, every game page, and the daily archive are free, no login. Best-price odds and the betting tools are the paid tier.

Best MLB H+R+RBI matchups — Tuesday, July 21, 2026

Every hitter on the Tuesday, July 21, 2026 slate — ranked by combined hits + runs + RBI upside — the best all-around production. Results show how each call played out.

How the model did — Tuesday, July 21, 2026

Our top 5 hitters went 2/5 (40%) on our H+R+RBI over/under, against 58% on the season.

Top 5

2/540%

season 58%

Top 10

3/1030%

season 59%

Full slate

109/23047%

season 50%

Top call Shea Langeliers came through. James Wood didn't.

Final · 2–5

MINaway

CLEhomeTop matchup72 Final · 2–1

LADaway

PHIhomeTop matchup75 Final · 12–2

TBaway

TORhomeTop matchup71 Final · 8–3

SDaway

ATLhomeTop matchup100 Final · 4–0

NYMaway

MILhomeTop matchup70 Final · 2–3

SFaway

KChomeTop matchup67 Final · 2–11

DETaway

CHChomeTop matchup70 Final · 0–10

CWSaway

TEXhomeTop matchup84 Final · 3–5

MIAaway

HOUhomeTop matchup87 Final · 7–8

WSHaway

COLhomeTop matchup100 Final · 1–5

STLaway

LAAhomeTop matchup81 Final · 5–6

ATHaway

AZhomeTop matchup100 Final · 4–2

CINaway

SEAhomeTop matchup93

Not starting60 not in the official lineup — moved to the bottom

PosSort

#Hitter · Matchup · 294 shownScore

170 with a H+R+RBILive count — updates as games play

1
Nick FortesC
TB@TOR· 3-for-5
9H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #192
2
CJ AbramsSS
WSH@COL· 2-for-3
8H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 2.1 H+R+RBI, #9
T2
Brandon NimmoRF
TEXvsCWS· 4-for-4
8H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #61
T2
Fernando Tatis Jr.RF
SD@ATL· 3-for-5
8H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #91
T2
Alejandro OsunaLF
TEXvsCWS· 3-for-4
8H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.5 H+R+RBI, #211
6
Yandy DíazDH
TB@TOR· 2-for-6
7H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 2.0 H+R+RBI, #30
7
Manny Machado3B
SD@ATL· 2-for-5
6H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #74
T7
Wyatt LangfordLF
TEXvsCWS· 2-for-4
6H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #79
T7
Mickey MoniakLF
COLvsWSH· 2-for-4
6H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #95
T7
Max KeplerLF
AZvsATH· 2-for-3
6H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #104
T7
Isaac Paredes3B
HOUvsMIA· 2-for-4
6H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #115
T7
Jonny DeLucaRF
TB@TOR· 2-for-6
6H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #122
T7
Ben Williamson2B
TB@TOR· 4-for-5
6H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #147
T7
Chandler SimpsonLF
TB@TOR· 4-for-5
6H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.4 H+R+RBI, #220
15
James WoodRF
WSH@COL· 2-for-5
5H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 2.2 H+R+RBI, #1
T15
Hunter GoodmanC
COLvsWSH· 2-for-5
5H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 2.1 H+R+RBI, #12
T15
Jo AdellRF
LAAvsSTL· 2-for-4
5H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #18
T15
Dillon DinglerC
DET@CHC· 2-for-3
5H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #81
T15
Pete Crow-ArmstrongCF
CHCvsDET· 2-for-2
5H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #103
T15
Jim JarvisSS
ATLvsSD· 2-for-3
5H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #152
T15
Dansby SwansonSS
CHCvsDET· 2-for-3
5H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.5 H+R+RBI, #197
22
Jake McCarthyCF
COLvsWSH· 2-for-5
4H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 2.2 H+R+RBI, #4
T22
Cole CarriggCF
COLvsWSH· 3-for-5
4H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 2.2 H+R+RBI, #7
T22
Jacob WilsonSS
ATH@AZ· 1-for-4
4H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #17
T22
Jeremy PeñaSS
HOUvsMIA· 1-for-4
4H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #44
T22
Alec Bohm3B
PHIvsLAD· 3-for-4
4H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #96
T22
Jorge SolerDH
LAAvsSTL· 1-for-4
4H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #99
T22
Carson KellyC
CHCvsDET· 1-for-3
4H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #111
T22
Max Muncy3B
LAD@PHI· 1-for-4
4H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #120
T22
Francisco LindorSS
NYM@MIL· 3-for-4
4H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #137
T22
Jackson MerrillCF
SD@ATL· 2-for-4
4H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #139
T22
Ezequiel DuranSS
TEXvsCWS· 2-for-5
4H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #155
T22
Carson BengeRF
NYM@MIL· 2-for-5
4H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #172
T22
Joe MackC
MIA@HOU· 1-for-4
4H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #179
T22
Cedric MullinsCF
TB@TOR· 2-for-6
4H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #189
T22
Jared Young1B
NYM@MIL· 2-for-4
4H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.5 H+R+RBI, #205
37
Shea LangeliersC
ATH@AZ· 1-for-4
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 2.1 H+R+RBI, #3
T37
Elly De La CruzSS
CIN@SEA· 1-for-3
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 2.0 H+R+RBI, #6
T37
Yordan AlvarezDH
HOUvsMIA· 2-for-4
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 2.1 H+R+RBI, #8
T37
Gabriel MorenoC
AZvsATH· 1-for-3
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #13
T37
Eugenio SuárezDH
CIN@SEA· 1-for-4
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #19
T37
Nathaniel LoweDH
CIN@SEA· 1-for-4
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #22
T37
José TenaDH
WSH@COL· 1-for-2
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 2.0 H+R+RBI, #26
T37
Seiya SuzukiRF
CHCvsDET· 0-for-3
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 2.0 H+R+RBI, #36
T37
Junior Caminero3B
TB@TOR· 2-for-3
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 2.0 H+R+RBI, #40
T37
Brayan RocchioSS
CLEvsMIN· 2-for-4
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #41
T37
Kyle Stowers1B
MIA@HOU· 2-for-5
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #50
T37
TJ Rumfield1B
COLvsWSH· 1-for-3
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #55
T37
Ty France1B
SD@ATL· 2-for-5
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #60
T37
Alec Burleson1B
STL@LAA· 3-for-4
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #64
T37
Carter JensenC
KCvsSF· 1-for-4
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #71
T37
Vaughn Grissom2B
LAAvsSTL· 1-for-4
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #90
T37
Josh Naylor1B
SEAvsCIN· 3-for-4
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #105
T37
Ernie Clement2B
TORvsTB· 2-for-4
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #110
T37
George SpringerDH
TORvsTB· 2-for-4
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #114
T37
Alex Bregman3B
CHCvsDET· 1-for-4
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #119
T37
Vinnie Pasquantino1B
KCvsSF· 2-for-3
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #121
T37
Nasim Nuñez2B
WSH@COL· 2-for-4
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #127
T37
Ryan JeffersC
MIN@CLE· 1-for-4
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #133
T37
Steven KwanLF
CLEvsMIN· 1-for-3
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #146
T37
Michael Busch1B
CHCvsDET· 1-for-5
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #153
T37
Luis Robert Jr.CF
NYM@MIL· 1-for-5
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #165
T37
Weston Wilson3B
SEAvsCIN· 1-for-4
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.5 H+R+RBI, #177
T37
Nick Loftin3B
KCvsSF· 2-for-4
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #183
T37
Drew GilbertCF
SF@KC· 1-for-4
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.5 H+R+RBI, #193
T37
Ildemaro Vargas1B
AZvsATH· 1-for-4
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.5 H+R+RBI, #201
T37
Travis Bazzana2B
CLEvsMIN· 1-for-2
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.5 H+R+RBI, #219
T37
Ian HappLF
CHCvsDET· 1-for-3
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.4 H+R+RBI, #223
T37
Luis RengifoLF
SD@ATL· 1-for-3
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.4 H+R+RBI, #224
T37
Javier Sanoja3B
MIA@HOU· 2-for-4
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.5 H+R+RBI, #225
T37
Julio RodríguezCF
SEAvsCIN· 1-for-2
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI
T37
Nicky Lopez2B
TEXvsCWS· 2-for-3
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.3 H+R+RBI
73
Luis García Jr.1B
WSH@COL· 2-for-5
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 2.2 H+R+RBI, #5
T73
Zach NetoSS
LAAvsSTL· 2-for-4
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #23
T73
Tyler SoderstromLF
ATH@AZ· 1-for-4
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #27
T73
Chase DeLauterRF
CLEvsMIN· 2-for-4
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 2.0 H+R+RBI, #28
T73
Mike TroutCF
LAAvsSTL· 1-for-3
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #29
T73
Ketel Marte2B
AZvsATH· 0-for-3
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #31
T73
Nolan Schanuel1B
LAAvsSTL· 1-for-2
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #34
T73
Jonathan Aranda1B
TB@TOR· 2-for-6
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #42
T73
Jake Burger1B
TEXvsCWS· 1-for-5
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #47
T73
Andy PagesCF
LAD@PHI· 1-for-4
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #49
T73
Willi Castro2B
COLvsWSH· 1-for-5
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #51
T73
Jonah HeimC
ATH@AZ· 1-for-4
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #52
T73
Nolan Arenado3B
AZvsATH· 1-for-5
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #65
T73
Bo Bichette3B
NYM@MIL· 1-for-4
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #69
T73
Josh Jung3B
TEXvsCWS· 1-for-2
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #83
T73
Blaze Jordan3B
STL@LAA· 1-for-4
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #84
T73
Tommy White3B
ATH@AZ· 2-for-5
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #89
T73
Hao-Yu Lee2B
DET@CHC· 1-for-4
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #92
T73
Corbin CarrollRF
AZvsATH· 1-for-5
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #100
T73
Daulton VarshoCF
TORvsTB· 1-for-4
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #128
T73
Heriberto HernándezLF
MIA@HOU· 2-for-4
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #130
T73
Josh BellDH
MIN@CLE· 1-for-4
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #131
T73
Troy JohnstonRF
COLvsWSH· 1-for-3
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #135
T73
Bryce Harper1B
PHIvsLAD· 1-for-4
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #138
T73
Jesus RodriguezC
SF@KC· 1-for-3
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #150
T73
Kyle Karros3B
COLvsWSH· 0-for-2
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #151
T73
Matt VierlingCF
DET@CHC· 2-for-4
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #156
T73
Nico Hoerner2B
CHCvsDET· 1-for-5
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #159
T73
Jose SiriCF
LAAvsSTL· 2-for-4
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #161
T73
Elias DíazC
TEXvsCWS· 1-for-3
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #167
T73
Cam CauleyCF
TEXvsCWS· 1-for-4
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #173
T73
Kody Clemens1B
MIN@CLE· 2-for-4
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #175
T73
Luis TorrensC
NYM@MIL· 2-for-4
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #188
T73
Austin HedgesC
CLEvsMIN· 0-for-2
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #190
T73
Alika WilliamsSS
ATH@AZ· 1-for-2
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.5 H+R+RBI, #198
T73
Gabriel Arias3B
CLEvsMIN· 2-for-4
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.5 H+R+RBI, #209
T73
Lawrence ButlerRF
ATH@AZ· 1-for-4
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.5 H+R+RBI, #212
T73
Lucas SpenceCF
HOUvsMIA· 1-for-3
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.5 H+R+RBI, #222
T73
Xander BogaertsSS
SD@ATL· 1-for-4
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.4 H+R+RBI, #226
T73
Isaac CollinsLF
KCvsSF· 1-for-1
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.5 H+R+RBI
113
Sal Stewart1B
CIN@SEA· 0-for-3
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 2.0 H+R+RBI, #10
T113
Jordan WalkerRF
STL@LAA· 1-for-4
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #15
T113
Munetaka Murakami1B
CWS@TEX· 1-for-3
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 2.0 H+R+RBI, #20
T113
Jackson ChourioLF
MILvsNYM· 1-for-4
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 2.0 H+R+RBI, #33
T113
Nathan LukesRF
TORvsTB· 1-for-4
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 2.0 H+R+RBI, #35
T113
Matt Olson1B
ATLvsSD· 1-for-4
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 2.0 H+R+RBI, #37
T113
Heliot RamosLF
SF@KC· 0-for-3
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #39
T113
Michael Harris IICF
ATLvsSD· 1-for-4
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #46
T113
Geraldo PerdomoSS
AZvsATH· 1-for-5
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #48
T113
Iván HerreraDH
STL@LAA· 1-for-4
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #57
T113
Trea TurnerSS
PHIvsLAD· 1-for-4
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #62
T113
Justin Foscue2B
TEXvsCWS· 1-for-5
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #66
T113
Daylen LileLF
WSH@COL· 1-for-4
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #68
T113
Bryce EldridgeDH
SF@KC· 1-for-4
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #70
T113
JJ Wetherholt2B
STL@LAA· 0-for-4
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #75
T113
Otto LopezSS
MIA@HOU· 0-for-3
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #76
T113
Shohei OhtaniTWP
LAD@PHI· 1-for-4
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #77
T113
Salvador PerezDH
KCvsSF· 0-for-3
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #78
T113
Griffin ConineRF
MIA@HOU· 1-for-3
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #80
T113
Tim TawaLF
AZvsATH· 1-for-5
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #82
T113
Miguel Vargas3B
CWS@TEX· 1-for-4
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #86
T113
Byron BuxtonCF
MIN@CLE· 1-for-4
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #93
T113
A.J. EwingCF
NYM@MIL· 1-for-4
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #94
T113
Keibert RuizC
WSH@COL· 0-for-3
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #97
T113
Kevin McGonigleSS
DET@CHC· 1-for-3
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #98
T113
Freddie Freeman1B
LAD@PHI· 1-for-4
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #108
T113
Jake Cronenworth2B
SD@ATL· 1-for-3
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #116
T113
Mauricio DubónLF
ATLvsSD· 0-for-3
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #134
T113
Jose TrevinoC
CIN@SEA· 1-for-4
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #143
T113
Jung Hoo LeeRF
SF@KC· 1-for-3
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #148
T113
Starling MarteRF
KCvsSF· 1-for-3
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #154
T113
Edwin Arroyo2B
CIN@SEA· 1-for-3
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #157
T113
Christian Walker1B
HOUvsMIA· 1-for-3
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #158
T113
LaMonte Wade Jr.LF
HOUvsMIA· 0-for-2
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #168
T113
Brewer HicklenCF
ATLvsSD· 0-for-3
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #170
T113
J.T. RealmutoC
PHIvsLAD· 1-for-4
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #171
T113
Luis CampusanoC
SD@ATL· 1-for-5
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #174
T113
Christian Koss2B
SF@KC· 1-for-2
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #176
T113
Ben MalgeriRF
DET@CHC· 1-for-4
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #182
T113
Michael Massey2B
KCvsSF· 1-for-4
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #184
T113
Marcus Semien2B
NYM@MIL· 1-for-4
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #186
T113
Taylor TrammellCF
HOUvsMIA· 1-for-3
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #187
T113
Joey OrtizSS
MILvsNYM· 1-for-2
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.5 H+R+RBI, #194
T113
Luisangel AcuñaSS
CWS@TEX· 1-for-3
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.5 H+R+RBI, #195
T113
TJ FriedlCF
CIN@SEA· 0-for-2
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.5 H+R+RBI, #206
T113
Cooper PrattSS
MILvsNYM· 1-for-3
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.5 H+R+RBI, #207
T113
Gavin Sheets1B
SD@ATL· 0-for-2
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.5 H+R+RBI, #214
T113
Myles StrawRF
TORvsTB· 1-for-3
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.5 H+R+RBI, #215
T113
Victor RoblesRF
SEAvsCIN· 1-for-4
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.5 H+R+RBI, #216
T113
Bryan TorresLF
STL@LAA· 1-for-1
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.4 H+R+RBI, #221
T113
Eliezer AlfonzoC
LAD@PHI· 1-for-2
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.4 H+R+RBI, #228
T113
Bryson Stott2B
PHIvsLAD· 1-for-3
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.4 H+R+RBI, #229
T113
Taylor WallsSS
TB@TOR· 0-for-5
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.4 H+R+RBI, #231
T113
Petey HalpinCF
CLEvsMIN· 0-for-2
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.4 H+R+RBI, #232
T113
Jorge BarrosaCF
AZvsATH· 1-for-3
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.4 H+R+RBI, #233
T113
Trevor LarnachLF
MIN@CLE· 1-for-1
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI
T113
Jake Bauers1B
MILvsNYM· 1-for-1
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI
T113
Pedro Ramírez2B
CHCvsDET· 1-for-1
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI

Best MLB H+R+RBI Matchups — Tuesday, July 21, 2026

James Wood (WSH) is the top h+r+rbi matchup on the Tuesday, July 21, 2026 board at 100, with Drake Baldwin (ATL) and Shea Langeliers (ATH) right behind. Every hitter on the slate is ranked by combined hits + runs + RBI upside — the best all-around production — the bat, the arm and bullpen they face, batting order, park, and weather. It's the read DFS and prop players make before lock.

Top h+r+rbi spot: James Wood

James Wood (WSH) tops the board at 100, projected for about 0.48 H+R+RBI per plate appearance across 4.7 projected trips. We build the number bottom-up — summing his projection on every component board — so it moves with each of those matchups instead of a single rate, and inherits their tuning.

The rest of the top of the board

Drake Baldwin (ATL) (100) vs RHP the starter: a strong bat at .491 into an arm with little track record against the same side.
Shea Langeliers (ATH) (100) vs RHP the starter: a solid bat at .463 into an arm with little track record against the same side.
Jake McCarthy (COL) (99) vs RHP the starter: a solid bat at .477 into an arm with little track record against the same side.
Luis García Jr. (WSH) (96) vs RHP the starter: a solid bat at .482 into an arm with little track record against the same side.
Elly De La Cruz (CIN) (93) vs RHP the starter: a league-average bat at .431 into an arm with little track record against the same side.
Cole Carrigg (COL) (92) vs RHP the starter: a solid bat at .475 into an arm with little track record against the same side.
Yordan Alvarez (HOU) (87) vs RHP the starter: a solid bat at .468 into an arm with little track record against the same side.

How it played out

9 of the top 10 h+r+rbi matchups landed at least one H+R+RBI. Top play James Wood finished with 5 H+R+RBI. We post the result next to every projection so you can grade the board yourself — and so the model gets re-tuned against what actually happened.

How to read these h+r+rbi matchups

Each score (0–100) starts with the hitter's combined hits + runs + RBIs per plate appearance against the hand he's facing — weighted toward the last two weeks, then the season, then a two-year baseline. Then it layers in the bullpen, his spot in the order, and park and weather. Higher means more of it points his way. It's context, not a lock — a great spot still goes 0-for-4 sometimes, and a tough one runs into one. The edge is in stacking the odds, and since we grade every board, you can see how often the top of the list delivers.

Keep reading

Frequently asked questions

Who has the best h+r+rbi matchup today (Tuesday, July 21, 2026)?: James Wood (WSH) — top of the board at 100, facing RHP the starter. A solid bat into a beatable arm is what pushes it to No. 1.
What are the best MLB h+r+rbi matchups today (Tuesday, July 21, 2026)?: The top h+r+rbi matchups on Tuesday, July 21, 2026: James Wood (100), Drake Baldwin (100), Shea Langeliers (100), Jake McCarthy (99), Luis García Jr. (96). The full board ranks every hitter in every game by h+r+rbi upside.
Did the top h+r+rbi matchup get a H+R+RBI on Tuesday, July 21, 2026?: Yes — James Wood got 5 H+R+RBI.
How is the h+r+rbi matchup score calculated?: It's a weighted read of the hitter's combined hits + runs + RBIs per plate appearance against the hand he's facing — the last two weeks, the current season, and a two-year baseline, with recent form counting most. Then it folds in the opposing bullpen, his expected plate appearances from the batting order, and park and weather. Scores are set 0–100 across the day's slate, so the best matchup is always 100.
What does H+R+RBI mean?: It adds a hitter's hits, runs scored, and runs batted in into one number — the books call it a combo prop. It rewards all-around production: a 2-hit night with a run and an RBI is 4. Per plate appearance, around .45 is league average.
What does the score actually mean?: Higher is better for the hitter. 80s and 90s mean the bat, the pitcher, and the park all line up. 40s and 50s mean it's neutral to tough. It's a ranking of how today's spots stack up against each other — not the odds of a H+R+RBI.
What's the confidence meter?: It's how much data is behind the call — sample size on both the hitter and the pitcher, plus whether the lineup's official. A high score with low confidence is a thinner read than the same score backed by a deep track record. It's not a probability of a H+R+RBI.
What is a platoon split (handedness split)?: Most hitters do better against the opposite hand — a lefty bat vs. a righty arm, and vice versa. That gap is the platoon split. The score leans hard on each hitter's rate against the hand he's facing today, which is why the same guy can rank very differently day to day.
What are park factors?: Parks aren't neutral. Dimensions, altitude, and weather make some easier to hit in than others. Above 1.00 bumps the score, below 1.00 trims it — same hitter, higher grade in a hitter's park than a pitcher's.
What do "2W", "SZN" and "2Y" mean?: The timeframes behind each rate: the last two weeks (recent form), the current season, and a trailing two years (a stable baseline). Recent form counts most, and small samples get pulled toward league average so a hot week doesn't fool the model.
What do "≈ est", "Due" and "Not starting" mean?: "≈ est" is a hitter we don't have splits for yet — a rookie or unmatched ID — shown at a league-baseline estimate instead of dropped. "Due" means he hasn't recorded a H+R+RBI in a while and profiles for regression. "Not starting" means he was projected but didn't make the official lineup, so he slides to the bottom where you can still look him up.
Can I use this for h+r+rbi props or DFS?: That's what it's built for — pre-slate research. The board surfaces which hitters have the best conditions today, and where one exists, we show the book's "1+ H+R+RBI" line so you can shop the price. We're not a sportsbook and we don't post picks — we show the matchup data, the line, and the result. (Best-price and all-book odds are a Pro feature.)
How accurate is the model?: We grade every board against real results, and the top of the board lands a H+R+RBI a lot more often than the slate as a whole. Weights get re-tuned weekly against actual outcomes on a held-out split, and since results sit next to projections, you can audit the hit rate yourself on any past date.
When do lineups update?: Projected lineups (marked "Proj") come from each team's last game. Official lineups usually drop about two hours before first pitch, and the board updates itself as they post. Batting order is a big driver, so it's worth a second look mid-afternoon — rankings shift as lineups lock.
Is MatchWiz free?: Yes. The full board, every game page, and the daily archive are free, no login. Best-price odds and the betting tools are the paid tier.

What the hits + runs + RBIs board is

The H+R+RBI board projects a hitter's combined H+R+RBI vs the book's line. One statistical model scores every matchup on the slate the same way — a star and a backup judged on the matchup in front of them, not their name — and every number is graded against the real box score once the games go final.

How the model gets its number

It isn't a gut call or a name game. The projection is built from a few things:

His hit, run, and RBI projections, composed from the tuned component boards.

Those pieces combine into one number, and the model re-tunes itself weekly against how its past calls actually landed.

Is there a betting edge here?

Composed from our tuned hit/run/RBI numbers, this grades efficient — no edge in any gap bin. Transparency board.

How to use it

A tidy one-number read on a hitter's all-around night; research, not a play.

Everything here is a research signal from the model, graded in public — not betting advice, and no outcome is guaranteed.

Learn more: How the model works · The picks story · Today's plays