Who has the best runs matchup today (Saturday, August 1, 2026)?

Carter Jensen (KC) — top of the board at 100, facing RHP Ryan Feltner. A solid bat into a beatable arm is what pushes it to No. 1.

What are the best MLB runs matchups today (Saturday, August 1, 2026)?

The top runs matchups on Saturday, August 1, 2026: Carter Jensen (100), Drake Baldwin (100), Kevin McGonigle (100), Dillon Dingler (99), Lane Thomas (96). The full board ranks every hitter in every game by runs upside.

Did the top runs matchup get a run on Saturday, August 1, 2026?

Yes — Carter Jensen got 1 run.

Which hitters have a platoon edge today?

Carter Jensen (KC) — lefty bat vs RHP, .120 against righties this year. Drake Baldwin (ATL) — lefty bat vs RHP, .164 against righties this year. Kevin McGonigle (DET) — lefty bat vs RHP, .153 against righties this year. Joc Pederson (TEX) — lefty bat vs RHP, .142 against righties this year. Matt Olson (ATL) — lefty bat vs RHP, .164 against righties this year.

How is the runs matchup score calculated?

It's a weighted read of the hitter's runs scored per plate appearance against the hand he's facing — the last two weeks, the current season, and a two-year baseline, with recent form counting most. Then it folds in the opposing bullpen, his expected plate appearances from the batting order, and park and weather. Scores are set 0–100 across the day's slate, so the best matchup is always 100.

It's the share of a hitter's plate appearances that end with him scoring a run. Around .117 is league average. Runs depend on getting on base and the bats behind you, so lineup spot and team context matter as much as the individual.

What does the score actually mean?

Higher is better for the hitter. 80s and 90s mean the bat, the pitcher, and the park all line up. 40s and 50s mean it's neutral to tough. It's a ranking of how today's spots stack up against each other — not the odds of a run.

What's the confidence meter?

It's how much data is behind the call — sample size on both the hitter and the pitcher, plus whether the lineup's official. A high score with low confidence is a thinner read than the same score backed by a deep track record. It's not a probability of a run.

What is a platoon split (handedness split)?

Most hitters do better against the opposite hand — a lefty bat vs. a righty arm, and vice versa. That gap is the platoon split. The score leans hard on each hitter's rate against the hand he's facing today, which is why the same guy can rank very differently day to day.

What are park factors?

Parks aren't neutral. Dimensions, altitude, and weather make some easier to hit in than others. Above 1.00 bumps the score, below 1.00 trims it — same hitter, higher grade in a hitter's park than a pitcher's.

What do "2W", "SZN" and "2Y" mean?

The timeframes behind each rate: the last two weeks (recent form), the current season, and a trailing two years (a stable baseline). Recent form counts most, and small samples get pulled toward league average so a hot week doesn't fool the model.

What do "≈ est", "Due" and "Not starting" mean?

"≈ est" is a hitter we don't have splits for yet — a rookie or unmatched ID — shown at a league-baseline estimate instead of dropped. "Due" means he hasn't recorded a run in a while and profiles for regression. "Not starting" means he was projected but didn't make the official lineup, so he slides to the bottom where you can still look him up.

Can I use this for runs props or DFS?

That's what it's built for — pre-slate research. The board surfaces which hitters have the best conditions today, and where one exists, we show the book's "1+ run" line so you can shop the price. We're not a sportsbook and we don't post picks — we show the matchup data, the line, and the result. (Best-price and all-book odds are a Pro feature.)

How accurate is the model?

We grade every board against real results, and the top of the board lands a run a lot more often than the slate as a whole. Weights get re-tuned weekly against actual outcomes on a held-out split, and since results sit next to projections, you can audit the hit rate yourself on any past date.

When do lineups update?

Projected lineups (marked "Proj") come from each team's last game. Official lineups usually drop about two hours before first pitch, and the board updates itself as they post. Batting order is a big driver, so it's worth a second look mid-afternoon — rankings shift as lineups lock.

Yes. The full board, every game page, and the daily archive are free, no login. Best-price odds and the betting tools are the paid tier.

Best MLB runs matchups — Saturday, August 1, 2026

Every hitter on the Saturday, August 1, 2026 slate — ranked by who's most likely to score a run. Results show how each call played out.

How the model did — Saturday, August 1, 2026

Our top 5 hitters went 3/5 (60%) on 1+ run, against 48% on the season.

Top 5

3/560%

season 48%

Top 10

6/1060%

season 47%

Full slate

101/27037%

season 38%

Top call Carter Jensen came through. Dillon Dingler didn't.

Final · 1–5

STLaway

TORhomeTop matchup79 Final · 0–1

CWSaway

TBhomeTop matchup72 Final · 6–2

MIAaway

NYMhomeTop matchup67 Final · 3–4

MINaway

SEAhomeTop matchup73 Final · 4–1

PITaway

CINhomeTop matchup83 Final · 5–0

PHIaway

BALhomeTop matchup83 Final · 4–5

TEXaway

HOUhomeTop matchup94 Final · 12–8

AZaway

CLEhomeTop matchup69 Final · 3–8

WSHaway

ATLhomeTop matchup100 Final · 2–5

NYYaway

CHChomeTop matchup65 Final · 6–12

KCaway

COLhomeTop matchup100 Final · 5–6

SFaway

SDhomeTop matchup76 Final · 3–2

BOSaway

LADhomeTop matchup73 Final · 3–1

MILaway

LAAhomeTop matchup84 Final · 8–6

DETaway

ATHhomeTop matchup100

Not starting65 not in the official lineup — moved to the bottom

PosSort

#Hitter · Matchup · 335 shownScore

103 with a RLive count — updates as games play

1
Randy ArozarenaLF
SEAvsMIN· 2-for-4
3RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #58
2
Kevin McGonigleSS
DET@ATH· 3-for-4
2RFinal
Proj 0.6 R, #3
T2
Gleyber Torres2B
DET@ATH· 2-for-5
2RFinal
Proj 0.6 R, #7
T2
Matt Olson1B
ATLvsWSH· 1-for-3
2RFinal
Proj 0.6 R, #9
T2
Ronald Acuña Jr.RF
ATLvsWSH· 1-for-4
2RFinal
Proj 0.6 R, #16
T2
Jake McCarthyCF
COLvsKC· 2-for-5
2RFinal
Proj 0.6 R, #23
T2
Yordan AlvarezDH
HOUvsTEX· 1-for-3
2RFinal
Proj 0.6 R, #32
T2
Chase DeLauterRF
CLEvsAZ· 1-for-5
2RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #56
T2
Ceddanne RafaelaCF
BOS@LAD· 2-for-4
2RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #64
T2
Dominic SmithDH
ATLvsWSH· 1-for-3
2RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #65
T2
Kyle Karros3B
COLvsKC· 2-for-5
2RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #66
T2
Corbin CarrollRF
AZ@CLE· 2-for-5
2RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #67
T2
TJ Rumfield1B
COLvsKC· 3-for-5
2RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #69
T2
Hunter GoodmanC
COLvsKC· 4-for-5
2RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #83
T2
Pete Crow-ArmstrongCF
CHCvsNYY· 1-for-3
2RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #87
T2
Otto LopezSS
MIA@NYM· 1-for-4
2RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #92
T2
Willi Castro2B
COLvsKC· 2-for-4
2RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #142
T2
Nolan Arenado3B
AZ@CLE· 2-for-4
2RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #172
T2
Xander BogaertsSS
SDvsSF· 2-for-4
2RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #175
T2
Spencer JonesCF
NYY@CHC· 2-for-4
2RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #199
T2
Henry BolteCF
ATHvsDET· 3-for-4
2RFinal
Proj 0.4 R, #235
T2
Ryan WaldschmidtCF
AZ@CLE· 2-for-3
2RFinal
Proj 0.4 R, #246
T2
James McCannC
AZ@CLE· 3-for-4
2RFinal
Proj 0.4 R, #260
24
Carter JensenC
KC@COL· 1-for-4
1RFinal
Proj 0.6 R, #1
T24
Drake BaldwinC
ATLvsWSH· 1-for-4
1RFinal
Proj 0.6 R, #2
T24
Jeremy PeñaSS
HOUvsTEX· 2-for-5
1RFinal
Proj 0.6 R, #6
T24
Jac CaglianoneRF
KC@COL· 1-for-5
1RFinal
Proj 0.6 R, #11
T24
Salvador PerezDH
KC@COL· 1-for-4
1RFinal
Proj 0.6 R, #14
T24
Riley GreeneLF
DET@ATH· 0-for-4
1RFinal
Proj 0.6 R, #15
T24
Vladimir Guerrero Jr.1B
TORvsSTL· 2-for-5
1RFinal
Proj 0.6 R, #22
T24
Cole Young2B
SEAvsMIN· 2-for-5
1RFinal
Proj 0.6 R, #25
T24
Iván HerreraDH
STL@TOR· 1-for-4
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #37
T24
Jacob WilsonSS
ATHvsDET· 1-for-5
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #38
T24
Kyle SchwarberDH
PHI@BAL· 0-for-4
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #39
T24
Spencer Torkelson1B
DET@ATH· 2-for-5
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #40
T24
Jung Hoo LeeRF
SF@SD· 1-for-5
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #42
T24
Mike TroutCF
LAAvsMIL· 2-for-3
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #44
T24
Bryce Harper1B
PHI@BAL· 2-for-4
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #45
T24
Trevor LarnachLF
MIN@SEA· 1-for-3
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #46
T24
Jackson ChourioLF
MIL@LAA· 1-for-4
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #47
T24
Isaac CollinsLF
KC@COL· 1-for-4
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #48
T24
Manny Machado3B
SDvsSF· 0-for-3
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #52
T24
Rafael Devers1B
SF@SD· 2-for-4
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #53
T24
Jake MangumCF
PIT@CIN· 2-for-5
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #72
T24
Brandon Lowe2B
PIT@CIN· 1-for-4
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #73
T24
James WoodRF
WSH@ATL· 0-for-3
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #75
T24
Tyler TolbertSS
KC@COL· 2-for-4
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #78
T24
Ty France1B
SDvsSF· 3-for-4
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #79
T24
Wyatt LangfordLF
TEX@HOU· 1-for-5
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #82
T24
Tommy White3B
ATHvsDET· 3-for-4
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #86
T24
Willy AdamesSS
SF@SD· 0-for-3
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #88
T24
John RaveRF
KC@COL· 2-for-4
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #89
T24
Evan CarterCF
TEX@HOU· 0-for-2
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #95
T24
Jake Bauers1B
MIL@LAA· 1-for-4
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #96
T24
Brandon MarshLF
PHI@BAL· 2-for-4
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #98
T24
Andrés Chaparro1B
WSH@ATL· 0-for-2
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #103
T24
George SpringerDH
TORvsSTL· 2-for-4
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #105
T24
Freddie Freeman1B
LADvsBOS· 3-for-4
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #106
T24
Dylan CrewsRF
WSH@ATL· 1-for-4
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #108
T24
Jonny DeLucaRF
TBvsCWS· 1-for-3
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #116
T24
Brooks Lee3B
MIN@SEA· 2-for-4
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #117
T24
Alex Bregman3B
CHCvsNYY· 1-for-2
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #122
T24
Max ClarkCF
DET@ATH· 2-for-5
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #130
T24
Ketel Marte2B
AZ@CLE· 1-for-5
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #131
T24
Garrett MitchellCF
MIL@LAA· 0-for-2
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #132
T24
Mike YastrzemskiLF
ATLvsWSH· 2-for-4
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #133
T24
J.T. RealmutoC
PHI@BAL· 0-for-3
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #134
T24
Ernie Clement2B
TORvsSTL· 1-for-4
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #138
T24
Rhys Hoskins1B
CLEvsAZ· 1-for-2
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #141
T24
Christian Walker1B
HOUvsTEX· 2-for-4
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #143
T24
Angel MartínezLF
CLEvsAZ· 2-for-5
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #147
T24
Luis RengifoLF
SDvsSF· 0-for-2
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #151
T24
Jose Altuve2B
HOUvsTEX· 0-for-2
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #154
T24
Marcell OzunaDH
PIT@CIN· 1-for-4
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #157
T24
Travis Bazzana2B
CLEvsAZ· 2-for-5
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #161
T24
Tyler SoderstromLF
ATHvsDET· 2-for-5
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #162
T24
Luke Keaschall2B
MIN@SEA· 1-for-3
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #164
T24
Marcus Semien2B
NYMvsMIA· 1-for-4
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #167
T24
Ezequiel DuranSS
TEX@HOU· 0-for-4
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #171
T24
Drew GilbertCF
SF@SD· 2-for-4
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #176
T24
Bryson Stott2B
PHI@BAL· 1-for-3
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #178
T24
Geraldo PerdomoSS
AZ@CLE· 4-for-6
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #179
T24
Tyrone TaylorLF
NYMvsMIA· 1-for-3
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #182
T24
Davis SchneiderLF
TORvsSTL· 0-for-1
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #188
T24
Zach McKinstry2B
DET@ATH· 1-for-4
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #190
T24
Lawrence ButlerRF
ATHvsDET· 2-for-5
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #192
T24
Esteury RuizRF
MIA@NYM· 2-for-3
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #194
T24
Jose TrevinoC
CINvsPIT· 1-for-3
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #197
T24
Osleivis BasabeSS
SF@SD· 2-for-4
1RFinal
Proj 0.4 R, #204
T24
Kyle Stowers1B
MIA@NYM· 1-for-4
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #212
T24
Nico Hoerner2B
CHCvsNYY· 2-for-4
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R, #213
T24
Andruw MonasterioSS
BOS@LAD· 1-for-3
1RFinal
Proj 0.4 R, #217
T24
Teoscar HernándezLF
LADvsBOS· 3-for-4
1RFinal
Proj 0.4 R, #220
T24
Griffin ConineRF
MIA@NYM· 2-for-3
1RFinal
Proj 0.4 R, #224
T24
Freddy FerminC
SDvsSF· 2-for-3
1RFinal
Proj 0.4 R, #225
T24
Ildemaro Vargas1B
AZ@CLE· 2-for-5
1RFinal
Proj 0.4 R, #228
T24
Javier Sanoja3B
MIA@NYM· 2-for-5
1RFinal
Proj 0.4 R, #232
T24
Henry DavisC
PIT@CIN· 1-for-3
1RFinal
Proj 0.4 R, #238
T24
Tyler FreemanRF
COLvsKC· 1-for-3
1RFinal
Proj 0.4 R, #239
T24
Elias DíazC
TEX@HOU· 1-for-3
1RFinal
Proj 0.4 R, #243
T24
Brenton DoyleCF
COLvsKC· 1-for-3
1RFinal
Proj 0.4 R, #248
T24
Pedro Ramírez2B
CHCvsNYY
1RFinal
Proj 0.5 R
T24
Andrés GiménezSS
TORvsSTL· 0-for-1
1RFinal
Proj 0.4 R

Best MLB Runs Matchups — Saturday, August 1, 2026

Carter Jensen (KC) is the top runs matchup on the Saturday, August 1, 2026 board at 100, with Drake Baldwin (ATL) and Kevin McGonigle (DET) right behind. Every hitter on the slate is ranked by who's most likely to score a run — on-base ability, the arm and bullpen they face, lineup spot, park, and weather. It's the read DFS and prop players make before lock.

Top runs spot: Carter Jensen

Carter Jensen (KC) tops the board at 100, facing RHP Ryan Feltner. The lefty is scoring at .120 R/PA against righties this year — and .136 over the last two weeks, a solid bat that turns into a run in about 12% of his trips. And Ryan Feltner has been getting lit up by righties lately — .261 runs per batter faced. The bullpen behind him hasn't been any better to that side, so there's no relief late. He's hitting in a spot worth about 4.7 trips, so the volume's there. No real history against Ryan Feltner. It all sets up in a neutral park.

The rest of the top of the board

Drake Baldwin (ATL) (100) vs RHP Miles Mikolas: a strong bat at .141 into an arm getting lit up by the same side (.182), due to bounce back.
Kevin McGonigle (DET) (100) vs RHP Jack Perkins: a strong bat at .136 into an arm vulnerable to the same side (.130).
Dillon Dingler (DET) (99) vs RHP Jack Perkins: a strong bat at .134 into an arm mostly holding up against the same side (.105).
Lane Thomas (KC) (96) vs RHP Ryan Feltner: a league-average bat at .105 into an arm getting lit up by the same side (.389).
Jeremy Peña (HOU) (94) vs RHP Jacob deGrom: an excellent bat at .168 into an arm getting lit up by the same side (.182), hot bat.
Gleyber Torres (DET) (91) vs RHP Jack Perkins: a league-average bat at .113 into an arm mostly holding up against the same side (.105).
Joc Pederson (TEX) (89) vs RHP Ronel Blanco: a strong bat at .140 into an arm getting lit up by the same side (.233).

Platoon edges to target

Carter Jensen (KC) — lefty bat vs RHP, .120 against righties this year.
Drake Baldwin (ATL) — lefty bat vs RHP, .164 against righties this year.
Kevin McGonigle (DET) — lefty bat vs RHP, .153 against righties this year.
Joc Pederson (TEX) — lefty bat vs RHP, .142 against righties this year.
Matt Olson (ATL) — lefty bat vs RHP, .164 against righties this year.

How it played out

6 of the top 10 runs matchups landed at least one run. Top play Carter Jensen finished with 1 run. We post the result next to every projection so you can grade the board yourself — and so the model gets re-tuned against what actually happened.

How to read these runs matchups

Each score (0–100) starts with the hitter's runs scored per plate appearance against the hand he's facing — weighted toward the last two weeks, then the season, then a two-year baseline. Then it layers in the bullpen, his spot in the order, and park and weather. Higher means more of it points his way. It's context, not a lock — a great spot still goes 0-for-4 sometimes, and a tough one runs into one. The edge is in stacking the odds, and since we grade every board, you can see how often the top of the list delivers.

Keep reading

Frequently asked questions

Who has the best runs matchup today (Saturday, August 1, 2026)?: Carter Jensen (KC) — top of the board at 100, facing RHP Ryan Feltner. A solid bat into a beatable arm is what pushes it to No. 1.
What are the best MLB runs matchups today (Saturday, August 1, 2026)?: The top runs matchups on Saturday, August 1, 2026: Carter Jensen (100), Drake Baldwin (100), Kevin McGonigle (100), Dillon Dingler (99), Lane Thomas (96). The full board ranks every hitter in every game by runs upside.
Did the top runs matchup get a run on Saturday, August 1, 2026?: Yes — Carter Jensen got 1 run.
Which hitters have a platoon edge today?: Carter Jensen (KC) — lefty bat vs RHP, .120 against righties this year. Drake Baldwin (ATL) — lefty bat vs RHP, .164 against righties this year. Kevin McGonigle (DET) — lefty bat vs RHP, .153 against righties this year. Joc Pederson (TEX) — lefty bat vs RHP, .142 against righties this year. Matt Olson (ATL) — lefty bat vs RHP, .164 against righties this year.
How is the runs matchup score calculated?: It's a weighted read of the hitter's runs scored per plate appearance against the hand he's facing — the last two weeks, the current season, and a two-year baseline, with recent form counting most. Then it folds in the opposing bullpen, his expected plate appearances from the batting order, and park and weather. Scores are set 0–100 across the day's slate, so the best matchup is always 100.
What does R/PA mean?: It's the share of a hitter's plate appearances that end with him scoring a run. Around .117 is league average. Runs depend on getting on base and the bats behind you, so lineup spot and team context matter as much as the individual.
What does the score actually mean?: Higher is better for the hitter. 80s and 90s mean the bat, the pitcher, and the park all line up. 40s and 50s mean it's neutral to tough. It's a ranking of how today's spots stack up against each other — not the odds of a run.
What's the confidence meter?: It's how much data is behind the call — sample size on both the hitter and the pitcher, plus whether the lineup's official. A high score with low confidence is a thinner read than the same score backed by a deep track record. It's not a probability of a run.
What is a platoon split (handedness split)?: Most hitters do better against the opposite hand — a lefty bat vs. a righty arm, and vice versa. That gap is the platoon split. The score leans hard on each hitter's rate against the hand he's facing today, which is why the same guy can rank very differently day to day.
What are park factors?: Parks aren't neutral. Dimensions, altitude, and weather make some easier to hit in than others. Above 1.00 bumps the score, below 1.00 trims it — same hitter, higher grade in a hitter's park than a pitcher's.
What do "2W", "SZN" and "2Y" mean?: The timeframes behind each rate: the last two weeks (recent form), the current season, and a trailing two years (a stable baseline). Recent form counts most, and small samples get pulled toward league average so a hot week doesn't fool the model.
What do "≈ est", "Due" and "Not starting" mean?: "≈ est" is a hitter we don't have splits for yet — a rookie or unmatched ID — shown at a league-baseline estimate instead of dropped. "Due" means he hasn't recorded a run in a while and profiles for regression. "Not starting" means he was projected but didn't make the official lineup, so he slides to the bottom where you can still look him up.
Can I use this for runs props or DFS?: That's what it's built for — pre-slate research. The board surfaces which hitters have the best conditions today, and where one exists, we show the book's "1+ run" line so you can shop the price. We're not a sportsbook and we don't post picks — we show the matchup data, the line, and the result. (Best-price and all-book odds are a Pro feature.)
How accurate is the model?: We grade every board against real results, and the top of the board lands a run a lot more often than the slate as a whole. Weights get re-tuned weekly against actual outcomes on a held-out split, and since results sit next to projections, you can audit the hit rate yourself on any past date.
When do lineups update?: Projected lineups (marked "Proj") come from each team's last game. Official lineups usually drop about two hours before first pitch, and the board updates itself as they post. Batting order is a big driver, so it's worth a second look mid-afternoon — rankings shift as lineups lock.
Is MatchWiz free?: Yes. The full board, every game page, and the daily archive are free, no login. Best-price odds and the betting tools are the paid tier.

What the runs board is

The Runs board projects the chance a hitter scores a run. One statistical model scores every matchup on the slate the same way — a star and a backup judged on the matchup in front of them, not their name — and every number is graded against the real box score once the games go final.

How the model gets its number

It isn't a gut call or a name game. The projection is built from a few things:

His on-base ability at the top of the order.
The bats due up behind him.
The opposing run-prevention.

Those pieces combine into one number, and the model re-tunes itself weekly against how its past calls actually landed.

Is there a betting edge here?

Like RBIs, runs is a lumpy market that grades efficient once you model the clustering honestly. Transparency board — our number set beside the line, graded.

How to use it

Useful context for top-of-the-order run creation, not a lean.

Everything here is a research signal from the model, graded in public — not betting advice, and no outcome is guaranteed.

Learn more: How the model works · The picks story · Today's plays