Who has the best total bases matchup today (Monday, June 8, 2026)?

Zach Neto (LAA) — top of the board at 100, facing RHP Spencer Arrighetti. A solid bat into a beatable arm is what pushes it to No. 1.

What are the best MLB total bases matchups today (Monday, June 8, 2026)?

The top total bases matchups on Monday, June 8, 2026: Zach Neto (100), Jeremy Peña (100), Casey Schmitt (96), James Wood (96), Shea Langeliers (96). The full board ranks every hitter in every game by total bases upside.

Did the top total bases matchup get a total base on Monday, June 8, 2026?

Yes — Zach Neto got 4 total bases.

Which pitchers are most vulnerable today?

RHP Spencer Arrighetti has been giving up bases to righties — .360 total bases per batter faced. Bats to target: Zach Neto (LAA), Mike Trout (LAA), and Jose Siri (LAA). RHP Grayson Rodriguez has been giving up bases to righties — .360 total bases per batter faced. Bats to target: Jeremy Peña (HOU), Yordan Alvarez (HOU), and Shay Whitcomb (HOU). LHP Richard Lovelady has been giving up bases to lefties — .360 total bases per batter faced. Bats to target: Casey Schmitt (SF), Rafael Devers (SF), and Luis Arraez (SF). RHP Logan Webb has been giving up bases to righties — .360 total bases per batter faced. Bats to target: James Wood (WSH), Luis García Jr. (WSH), and Andrés Chaparro (WSH).

How is the total bases matchup score calculated?

It's his bases-per-trip rate against that hand, recent form weighted heaviest, over a two-year baseline. Because this counts extra-base damage, slug matters as much as contact. Then the bullpen, order spot, and the yard. 0–100 across the slate.

What does TB/PA mean?

Total bases is 1 for a single, 2 for a double, 3 for a triple, 4 for a homer — so it rewards power, not just contact. Per plate appearance, around .37 is league average; .50+ is big-time slug. It's the cleanest power matchup we run: both the bat's slug and the arm's slug-against are real.

What does the score actually mean?

Higher is better. Total bases rewards the guys who do damage rather than just make contact, so this board leans slugger where the hits board leans average. It ranks today's spots, not the odds of any particular number.

What's the confidence meter?

It's how much data is behind the call — sample size on both the hitter and the pitcher, plus whether the lineup's official. A high score with low confidence is a thinner read than the same score backed by a deep track record. It's not a probability of a total base.

What is a platoon split (handedness split)?

Total bases blends contact and power, so the platoon gap cuts twice: the opposite hand means both more balls in play and more of them driven. A hitter with a big split can swing a full base per game between the two matchups.

What are park factors?

Every extra foot of outfield is a base. Gaps and altitude turn singles into doubles and doubles into triples, while a small park trades the same batted ball for a home run. Above 1.00 bumps the score, below 1.00 trims it.

What do "2W", "SZN" and "2Y" mean?

The timeframes behind each rate: the last two weeks (recent form), the current season, and a trailing two years (a stable baseline). Recent form counts most, and small samples get pulled toward league average so a hot week doesn't fool the model.

What do "≈ est", "Due" and "Not starting" mean?

"≈ est" is a hitter we don't have splits for yet — a rookie or unmatched ID — shown at a league-baseline estimate instead of dropped. "Due" means he hasn't recorded a total base in a while and profiles for regression. "Not starting" means he was projected but didn't make the official lineup, so he slides to the bottom where you can still look him up.

Can I use this for total bases props or DFS?

That's what it's built for — pre-slate research. The board surfaces which hitters have the best conditions today, and where one exists, we show the book's "1+ total base" line so you can shop the price. We're not a sportsbook and we don't post picks — we show the matchup data, the line, and the result. (Best-price and all-book odds are a Pro feature.)

How accurate is the model?

We grade every board against the box score. Total bases is one of the steadier props we publish — more ways to clear the line means less variance — and the top of the board beats the slate consistently. Every past date is auditable.

When do lineups update?

Projected lineups (marked "Proj") come from each team's last game. Official lineups usually drop about two hours before first pitch, and the board updates itself as they post. Batting order is a big driver, so it's worth a second look mid-afternoon — rankings shift as lineups lock.

Yes. The full board, every game page, and the daily archive are free, no login. Best-price odds and the betting tools are the paid tier.

Best MLB total bases matchups — Monday, June 8, 2026

Every hitter on the Monday, June 8, 2026 slate — ranked by total-base upside — the best power and extra-base spots. Results show how each call played out.

How the model did — Monday, June 8, 2026

Our top 5 hitters went 3/5 (60%) on our total-bases over/under, against 53% on the season.

Top 5

3/560%

season 53%

Top 10

6/1060%

season 52%

Full slate

61/11454%

season 51%

Top call Zach Neto came through. Jeremy Peña didn't.

Each hitter below carries a 0–100 matchup score — a read on the spot in front of him, not a ranking of how good he is, so a star in a brutal matchup can sit below an average hitter in a soft one. Confidence next to it is coverage: how much real data backs the number. Every call here was graded against the box score — wins and misses both, with the record on this page. How this board is built →

Final · 6–3

SEAaway

BALhomeTop matchup75 Final · 1–3

BOSaway

TBhomeTop matchup83 Final · 7–5

NYYaway

CLEhomeTop matchup83 Final · 5–2

PHIaway

TORhomeTop matchup83 Final · 5–4

HOUaway

LAAhomeTop matchup100 Final · 2–6

CINaway

SDhomeTop matchup87 Final · 4–3

WSHaway

SFhomeTop matchup96 Final · 15–14

MILaway

ATHhomeTop matchup96

Not starting46 not in the official lineup — moved to the bottom

PosSort

#Hitter · Matchup · 190 shownScore

99 with a TBLive count — updates as games play

1
Nick Kurtz1B
ATHvsMIL· 3-for-6
9TBFinal
Proj 1.7 TB, #13
T1
Andrew Vaughn1B
MIL@ATH· 4-for-6
9TBFinal
Proj 1.6 TB, #83
T1
Tyler SoderstromLF
ATHvsMIL· 3-for-4
9TBFinal
Proj 1.6 TB, #84
4
Shea LangeliersC
ATHvsMIL· 3-for-7
6TBFinal
Proj 1.8 TB, #5
T4
William ContrerasC
MIL@ATH· 3-for-6
6TBFinal
Proj 1.7 TB, #44
T4
Zack Gelof3B
ATHvsMIL· 2-for-6
6TBFinal
Proj 1.5 TB, #109
7
Josh Naylor1B
SEA@BAL· 2-for-4
5TBFinal
Proj 1.6 TB, #62
T7
Ernie Clement2B
TORvsPHI· 2-for-4
5TBFinal
Proj 1.6 TB, #77
T7
Freddy FerminC
SDvsCIN· 2-for-3
5TBFinal
Proj 1.4 TB, #133
T7
Jake Bauers1B
MIL@ATH· 2-for-4
5TBFinal
Proj 1.6 TB
11
Zach NetoSS
LAAvsHOU· 1-for-4
4TBFinal
Proj 1.8 TB, #1
T11
Yandy DíazDH
TBvsBOS· 1-for-3
4TBFinal
Proj 1.7 TB, #14
T11
Brice Turang2B
MIL@ATH· 1-for-6
4TBFinal
Proj 1.7 TB, #28
T11
Jung Hoo LeeRF
SFvsWSH· 4-for-5
4TBFinal
Proj 1.6 TB, #57
T11
Cam SmithRF
HOU@LAA· 2-for-5
4TBFinal
Proj 1.5 TB, #87
T11
Angel MartínezLF
CLEvsNYY· 1-for-4
4TBFinal
Proj 1.5 TB, #98
T11
Adolis GarcíaRF
PHI@TOR· 1-for-4
4TBFinal
Proj 1.4 TB, #130
T11
Jonah HeimC
ATHvsMIL· 1-for-1
4TBFinal
Proj 1.7 TB
T11
Paul Goldschmidt1B
NYY@CLE· 1-for-4
4TBFinal
Proj 1.6 TB
T11
Marcelo Mayer2B
BOS@TB· 1-for-2
4TBFinal
Proj 1.4 TB
T11
Ryan McMahon3B
NYY@CLE· 1-for-2
4TBFinal
Proj 1.4 TB
22
Luis García Jr.1B
WSH@SF· 2-for-4
3TBFinal
Proj 1.7 TB, #10
T22
Jackson ChourioLF
MIL@ATH· 3-for-5
3TBFinal
Proj 1.7 TB, #12
T22
Xander BogaertsSS
SDvsCIN· 2-for-4
3TBFinal
Proj 1.6 TB, #69
T22
Randy ArozarenaLF
SEA@BAL· 3-for-4
3TBFinal
Proj 1.6 TB, #74
T22
Bryce EldridgeDH
SFvsWSH· 2-for-5
3TBFinal
Proj 1.6 TB, #82
T22
Matt McLain2B
CIN@SD· 2-for-3
3TBFinal
Proj 1.5 TB, #104
T22
Dominic CanzoneDH
SEA@BAL· 2-for-3
3TBFinal
Proj 1.5 TB, #105
T22
Patrick BaileyC
CLEvsNYY· 2-for-5
3TBFinal
Proj 1.4 TB, #132
T22
Christian Walker1B
HOU@LAA· 2-for-4
3TBFinal
Proj 1.7 TB
T22
Trey Mancini1B
LAAvsHOU· 3-for-4
3TBFinal
Proj 1.5 TB
32
Casey SchmittLF
SFvsWSH· 2-for-5
2TBFinal
Proj 1.8 TB, #3
T32
Christian YelichDH
MIL@ATH· 2-for-7
2TBFinal
Proj 1.8 TB, #6
T32
Trent GrishamCF
NYY@CLE· 2-for-4
2TBFinal
Proj 1.7 TB, #19
T32
JJ BledayLF
CIN@SD· 1-for-4
2TBFinal
Proj 1.7 TB, #24
T32
Luis Arraez2B
SFvsWSH· 2-for-5
2TBFinal
Proj 1.7 TB, #25
T32
Taylor WardDH
BALvsSEA· 2-for-3
2TBFinal
Proj 1.7 TB, #29
T32
Ben RiceDH
NYY@CLE· 2-for-3
2TBFinal
Proj 1.7 TB, #36
T32
Isaac Paredes3B
HOU@LAA· 1-for-5
2TBFinal
Proj 1.7 TB, #38
T32
CJ AbramsSS
WSH@SF· 2-for-4
2TBFinal
Proj 1.7 TB, #42
T32
Cody BellingerLF
NYY@CLE· 2-for-5
2TBFinal
Proj 1.6 TB, #67
T32
Gavin Sheets1B
SDvsCIN· 1-for-4
2TBFinal
Proj 1.5 TB, #88
T32
Matt Chapman3B
SFvsWSH· 2-for-3
2TBFinal
Proj 1.5 TB, #91
T32
Andrés GiménezSS
TORvsPHI· 1-for-4
2TBFinal
Proj 1.5 TB, #97
T32
Jase BowenRF
SDvsCIN· 2-for-3
2TBFinal
Proj 1.5 TB, #103
T32
Bryson Stott2B
PHI@TOR· 1-for-3
2TBFinal
Proj 1.5 TB, #113
T32
Logan O'HoppeC
LAAvsHOU· 1-for-4
2TBFinal
Proj 1.5 TB, #117
T32
Collin PriceC
HOU@LAA· 1-for-4
2TBFinal
Proj 1.5 TB, #118
T32
Alika WilliamsSS
ATHvsMIL· 1-for-5
2TBFinal
Proj 1.4 TB, #126
T32
Blaze Alexander3B
BALvsSEA· 2-for-3
2TBFinal
Proj 1.4 TB, #135
T32
Yohendrick PiñangoLF
TORvsPHI· 1-for-2
2TBFinal
Proj 1.4 TB, #139
T32
Brayan RocchioSS
CLEvsNYY· 2-for-4
2TBFinal
Proj 1.4 TB, #141
T32
LaMonte Wade Jr.LF
HOU@LAA· 1-for-2
2TBFinal
Proj 1.5 TB
T32
Myles StrawCF
TORvsPHI· 1-for-2
2TBFinal
Proj 1.5 TB
T32
Drew GilbertCF
SFvsWSH· 1-for-2
2TBFinal
Proj 1.4 TB
T32
Joey OrtizSS
MIL@ATH· 2-for-3
2TBFinal
Proj 1.4 TB
T32
Edmundo SosaLF
PHI@TOR· 1-for-3
2TBFinal
Proj 1.4 TB
58
James WoodRF
WSH@SF· 1-for-4
1TBFinal
Proj 1.8 TB, #4
T58
Blake DunnCF
CIN@SD· 1-for-5
1TBFinal
Proj 1.7 TB, #9
T58
Kyle SchwarberDH
PHI@TOR· 1-for-4
1TBFinal
Proj 1.7 TB, #16
T58
Jose SiriCF
LAAvsHOU· 1-for-1
1TBFinal
Proj 1.7 TB, #21
T58
Cole Young2B
SEA@BAL· 1-for-5
1TBFinal
Proj 1.7 TB, #30
T58
Ceddanne RafaelaCF
BOS@TB· 1-for-4
1TBFinal
Proj 1.7 TB, #32
T58
Nathan LukesRF
TORvsPHI· 1-for-4
1TBFinal
Proj 1.7 TB, #34
T58
José Ramírez3B
CLEvsNYY· 1-for-4
1TBFinal
Proj 1.7 TB, #35
T58
Ty France1B
SDvsCIN· 1-for-4
1TBFinal
Proj 1.7 TB, #39
T58
Sal Stewart1B
CIN@SD· 1-for-3
1TBFinal
Proj 1.7 TB, #40
T58
Gunnar HendersonSS
BALvsSEA· 1-for-2
1TBFinal
Proj 1.6 TB, #45
T58
Wilyer AbreuRF
BOS@TB· 1-for-4
1TBFinal
Proj 1.6 TB, #48
T58
Chase DeLauterRF
CLEvsNYY· 1-for-5
1TBFinal
Proj 1.6 TB, #52
T58
Blake PerkinsCF
MIL@ATH· 1-for-2
1TBFinal
Proj 1.6 TB, #60
T58
Nick Madrigal3B
LAAvsHOU· 1-for-3
1TBFinal
Proj 1.6 TB, #71
T58
Brice MatthewsCF
HOU@LAA· 1-for-2
1TBFinal
Proj 1.6 TB, #72
T58
Jonathan Aranda1B
TBvsBOS· 1-for-4
1TBFinal
Proj 1.6 TB, #75
T58
Mickey GasperC
BOS@TB· 1-for-4
1TBFinal
Proj 1.6 TB, #76
T58
Alec Bohm3B
PHI@TOR· 1-for-3
1TBFinal
Proj 1.6 TB, #78
T58
Leody TaverasCF
BALvsSEA· 1-for-4
1TBFinal
Proj 1.5 TB, #85
T58
Noelvi MarteRF
CIN@SD· 1-for-4
1TBFinal
Proj 1.5 TB, #89
T58
Keibert RuizC
WSH@SF· 1-for-4
1TBFinal
Proj 1.5 TB, #90
T58
Henry BolteCF
ATHvsMIL· 1-for-6
1TBFinal
Proj 1.5 TB, #92
T58
J.T. RealmutoC
PHI@TOR· 1-for-4
1TBFinal
Proj 1.5 TB, #96
T58
Spencer JonesRF
NYY@CLE· 1-for-4
1TBFinal
Proj 1.5 TB, #99
T58
Samad TaylorLF
SDvsCIN· 1-for-3
1TBFinal
Proj 1.5 TB, #119
T58
Tyler StephensonC
CIN@SD· 1-for-3
1TBFinal
Proj 1.5 TB, #120
T58
Nasim Nuñez2B
WSH@SF· 1-for-3
1TBFinal
Proj 1.4 TB, #124
T58
Nick FortesC
TBvsBOS· 1-for-3
1TBFinal
Proj 1.4 TB, #127
T58
Edwin Arroyo2B
CIN@SD· 1-for-3
1TBFinal
Proj 1.4 TB, #134
T58
Jhonny PeredaC
SEA@BAL· 1-for-4
1TBFinal
Proj 1.4 TB, #136
T58
Cedric MullinsCF
TBvsBOS· 1-for-2
1TBFinal
Proj 1.4 TB, #137
T58
Justin CrawfordCF
PHI@TOR· 1-for-1
1TBFinal
Proj 1.4 TB, #140
T58
Colby ThomasRF
ATHvsMIL· 1-for-2
1TBFinal
Proj 1.7 TB
T58
Austin SlaterRF
TBvsBOS· 1-for-3
1TBFinal
Proj 1.7 TB
T58
Wade MecklerLF
LAAvsHOU· 1-for-4
1TBFinal
Proj 1.7 TB
T58
Junior Caminero3B
TBvsBOS· 1-for-3
1TBFinal
Proj 1.6 TB
T58
Nathaniel Lowe1B
CIN@SD· 1-for-3
1TBFinal
Proj 1.6 TB
T58
Max Muncy3B
ATHvsMIL· 1-for-5
1TBFinal
Proj 1.6 TB
T58
Ryan ViladeRF
TBvsBOS· 1-for-2
1TBFinal
Proj 1.6 TB
T58
Kyle Manzardo1B
CLEvsNYY· 1-for-1
1TBFinal
Proj 1.6 TB
T58
Daylen LileLF
WSH@SF· 1-for-4
1TBFinal
Proj 1.6 TB

Best MLB Total Bases Matchups — Monday, June 8, 2026

Zach Neto (LAA) is the top total bases matchup on the Monday, June 8, 2026 board at 100, with Jeremy Peña (HOU) and Casey Schmitt (SF) right behind. Every hitter on the slate is ranked by total-base upside — the best power and extra-base spots — raw power, the arm and bullpen they face, batting order, park, and weather. It's the read DFS and prop players make before lock.

Top total bases spot: Zach Neto

Zach Neto (LAA) tops the board at 100, facing RHP Spencer Arrighetti. The righty is racking up bases at — TB/PA against righties this year, a solid bat that turns into a total base in about 37% of his trips. And Spencer Arrighetti has been thin against righties lately. The bullpen behind him is roughly average to that side. He's hitting in a spot worth about 4.7 trips, so the volume's there. He's owned Spencer Arrighetti too — .333 across 6 career trips. It all sets up in a neutral park, weather helping.

The rest of the top of the board

Jeremy Peña (HOU) (100) vs RHP Grayson Rodriguez: a solid bat at .370 into an arm with little track record against the same side.
Casey Schmitt (SF) (96) vs LHP Richard Lovelady: a solid bat at .370 into an arm with little track record against the same side, due to bounce back.
James Wood (WSH) (96) vs RHP Logan Webb: a solid bat at .370 into an arm with little track record against the same side.
Shea Langeliers (ATH) (96) vs LHP Kyle Harrison: a solid bat at .370 into an arm with little track record against the same side.
Christian Yelich (MIL) (96) vs LHP Jeffrey Springs: a solid bat at .370 into an arm with little track record against the same side.
Mike Trout (LAA) (91) vs RHP Spencer Arrighetti: a solid bat at .370 into an arm with little track record against the same side, due to bounce back.
Fernando Tatis Jr. (SD) (87) vs LHP Andrew Abbott: a solid bat at .370 into an arm with little track record against the same side.

Arms giving up extra bases today

RHP Spencer Arrighetti has been giving up bases to righties — .360 total bases per batter faced. Bats to target: Zach Neto (LAA), Mike Trout (LAA), and Jose Siri (LAA).
RHP Grayson Rodriguez has been giving up bases to righties — .360 total bases per batter faced. Bats to target: Jeremy Peña (HOU), Yordan Alvarez (HOU), and Shay Whitcomb (HOU).
LHP Richard Lovelady has been giving up bases to lefties — .360 total bases per batter faced. Bats to target: Casey Schmitt (SF), Rafael Devers (SF), and Luis Arraez (SF).
RHP Logan Webb has been giving up bases to righties — .360 total bases per batter faced. Bats to target: James Wood (WSH), Luis García Jr. (WSH), and Andrés Chaparro (WSH).

How it played out

7 of the top 10 total bases matchups landed at least one total base. Top play Zach Neto finished with 4 total bases. We post the result next to every projection so you can grade the board yourself — and so the model gets re-tuned against what actually happened.

How to read these total bases matchups

Each score (0–100) starts with the hitter's total bases per plate appearance against the hand he's facing — weighted toward the last two weeks, then the season, then a two-year baseline. Then it layers in the bullpen, his spot in the order, and park and weather. Higher means more of it points his way. It's context, not a lock — a great spot still goes 0-for-4 sometimes, and a tough one runs into one. The edge is in stacking the odds, and since we grade every board, you can see how often the top of the list delivers.

Keep reading

What the total bases board is

The Total Bases board projects how many bases a hitter racks up vs the posted total-bases line. One statistical model scores every matchup on the slate the same way — a star and a backup judged on the matchup in front of them, not their name — and every number is graded against the real box score once the games go final.

How the model gets its number

It isn't a gut call or a name game. The projection is built from a few things:

His extra-base pop vs this arm.
The park.
Recent contact quality.

Those pieces combine into one number, and the model re-tunes itself weekly against how its past calls actually landed.

Is there a betting edge here?

Total bases grades right at break-even even when we tune it to the hilt — the book prices the marginal leans efficiently. Transparency board.

How to use it

See who the model projects for extra-base damage; no systematic edge to bet.

Everything here is a research signal from the model, graded in public — not betting advice, and no outcome is guaranteed.

Learn more: How the model works · The picks story · Today's plays

Frequently asked questions

Who has the best total bases matchup today (Monday, June 8, 2026)?: Zach Neto (LAA) — top of the board at 100, facing RHP Spencer Arrighetti. A solid bat into a beatable arm is what pushes it to No. 1.
What are the best MLB total bases matchups today (Monday, June 8, 2026)?: The top total bases matchups on Monday, June 8, 2026: Zach Neto (100), Jeremy Peña (100), Casey Schmitt (96), James Wood (96), Shea Langeliers (96). The full board ranks every hitter in every game by total bases upside.
Did the top total bases matchup get a total base on Monday, June 8, 2026?: Yes — Zach Neto got 4 total bases.
Which pitchers are most vulnerable today?: RHP Spencer Arrighetti has been giving up bases to righties — .360 total bases per batter faced. Bats to target: Zach Neto (LAA), Mike Trout (LAA), and Jose Siri (LAA). RHP Grayson Rodriguez has been giving up bases to righties — .360 total bases per batter faced. Bats to target: Jeremy Peña (HOU), Yordan Alvarez (HOU), and Shay Whitcomb (HOU). LHP Richard Lovelady has been giving up bases to lefties — .360 total bases per batter faced. Bats to target: Casey Schmitt (SF), Rafael Devers (SF), and Luis Arraez (SF). RHP Logan Webb has been giving up bases to righties — .360 total bases per batter faced. Bats to target: James Wood (WSH), Luis García Jr. (WSH), and Andrés Chaparro (WSH).
How is the total bases matchup score calculated?: It's his bases-per-trip rate against that hand, recent form weighted heaviest, over a two-year baseline. Because this counts extra-base damage, slug matters as much as contact. Then the bullpen, order spot, and the yard. 0–100 across the slate.
What does TB/PA mean?: Total bases is 1 for a single, 2 for a double, 3 for a triple, 4 for a homer — so it rewards power, not just contact. Per plate appearance, around .37 is league average; .50+ is big-time slug. It's the cleanest power matchup we run: both the bat's slug and the arm's slug-against are real.
What does the score actually mean?: Higher is better. Total bases rewards the guys who do damage rather than just make contact, so this board leans slugger where the hits board leans average. It ranks today's spots, not the odds of any particular number.
What's the confidence meter?: It's how much data is behind the call — sample size on both the hitter and the pitcher, plus whether the lineup's official. A high score with low confidence is a thinner read than the same score backed by a deep track record. It's not a probability of a total base.
What is a platoon split (handedness split)?: Total bases blends contact and power, so the platoon gap cuts twice: the opposite hand means both more balls in play and more of them driven. A hitter with a big split can swing a full base per game between the two matchups.
What are park factors?: Every extra foot of outfield is a base. Gaps and altitude turn singles into doubles and doubles into triples, while a small park trades the same batted ball for a home run. Above 1.00 bumps the score, below 1.00 trims it.
What do "2W", "SZN" and "2Y" mean?: The timeframes behind each rate: the last two weeks (recent form), the current season, and a trailing two years (a stable baseline). Recent form counts most, and small samples get pulled toward league average so a hot week doesn't fool the model.
What do "≈ est", "Due" and "Not starting" mean?: "≈ est" is a hitter we don't have splits for yet — a rookie or unmatched ID — shown at a league-baseline estimate instead of dropped. "Due" means he hasn't recorded a total base in a while and profiles for regression. "Not starting" means he was projected but didn't make the official lineup, so he slides to the bottom where you can still look him up.
Can I use this for total bases props or DFS?: That's what it's built for — pre-slate research. The board surfaces which hitters have the best conditions today, and where one exists, we show the book's "1+ total base" line so you can shop the price. We're not a sportsbook and we don't post picks — we show the matchup data, the line, and the result. (Best-price and all-book odds are a Pro feature.)
How accurate is the model?: We grade every board against the box score. Total bases is one of the steadier props we publish — more ways to clear the line means less variance — and the top of the board beats the slate consistently. Every past date is auditable.
When do lineups update?: Projected lineups (marked "Proj") come from each team's last game. Official lineups usually drop about two hours before first pitch, and the board updates itself as they post. Batting order is a big driver, so it's worth a second look mid-afternoon — rankings shift as lineups lock.
Is MatchWiz free?: Yes. The full board, every game page, and the daily archive are free, no login. Best-price odds and the betting tools are the paid tier.