Who has the best h+r+rbi matchup today (Thursday, July 9, 2026)?

Cole Carrigg (COL) — top of the board at 100, facing RHP the starter. A solid bat into a beatable arm is what pushes it to No. 1.

What are the best MLB h+r+rbi matchups today (Thursday, July 9, 2026)?

The top h+r+rbi matchups on Thursday, July 9, 2026: Cole Carrigg (100), Michael Harris II (100), Elly De La Cruz (100), Jake McCarthy (96), Ceddanne Rafaela (95). The full board ranks every hitter in every game by h+r+rbi upside.

Did the top h+r+rbi matchup get a H+R+RBI on Thursday, July 9, 2026?

No — Cole Carrigg didn't record a H+R+RBI.

How is the h+r+rbi matchup score calculated?

It blends three routes to the line: his hit rate against that hand, the bats in front of him for RBI, and the bats behind him for runs. Recent form counts most. Then the bullpen, order spot and park. 0–100 across the slate.

What does H+R+RBI mean?

It adds a hitter's hits, runs scored, and runs batted in into one number — the books call it a combo prop. It rewards all-around production: a 2-hit night with a run and an RBI is 4. Per plate appearance, around .45 is league average.

What does the score actually mean?

Higher is better. H+R+RBI is the most forgiving prop on the board — three ways to get there — so scores run higher here than on any single-outcome board. Compare within this board, not across.

What's the confidence meter?

It's how much data is behind the call — sample size on both the hitter and the pitcher, plus whether the lineup's official. A high score with low confidence is a thinner read than the same score backed by a deep track record. It's not a probability of a H+R+RBI.

What is a platoon split (handedness split)?

This board stacks three outcomes, so the platoon split compounds. The opposite hand lifts his own hit chances and the chances he's on base when the next guy drives him in.

What are park factors?

A park that produces hits produces all three legs of this number. Gaps, altitude, and weather raise the whole line together. Above 1.00 bumps the score, below 1.00 trims it.

What do "2W", "SZN" and "2Y" mean?

The timeframes behind each rate: the last two weeks (recent form), the current season, and a trailing two years (a stable baseline). Recent form counts most, and small samples get pulled toward league average so a hot week doesn't fool the model.

What do "≈ est", "Due" and "Not starting" mean?

"≈ est" is a hitter we don't have splits for yet — a rookie or unmatched ID — shown at a league-baseline estimate instead of dropped. "Due" means he hasn't recorded a H+R+RBI in a while and profiles for regression. "Not starting" means he was projected but didn't make the official lineup, so he slides to the bottom where you can still look him up.

Can I use this for h+r+rbi props or DFS?

That's what it's built for — pre-slate research. The board surfaces which hitters have the best conditions today, and where one exists, we show the book's "1+ H+R+RBI" line so you can shop the price. We're not a sportsbook and we don't post picks — we show the matchup data, the line, and the result. (Best-price and all-book odds are a Pro feature.)

How accurate is the model?

We grade every board against the box score. Three ways to clear one line makes this the most forgiving prop we publish, and the hit rate reflects that — compare it against the other boards' rates, not in isolation.

When do lineups update?

Projected lineups (marked "Proj") come from each team's last game. Official lineups usually drop about two hours before first pitch, and the board updates itself as they post. Batting order is a big driver, so it's worth a second look mid-afternoon — rankings shift as lineups lock.

Yes. The full board, every game page, and the daily archive are free, no login. Best-price odds and the betting tools are the paid tier.

Best MLB H+R+RBI matchups — Thursday, July 9, 2026

Every hitter on the Thursday, July 9, 2026 slate — ranked by combined hits + runs + RBI upside — the best all-around production. Results show how each call played out.

How the model did — Thursday, July 9, 2026

Our top 5 hitters went 1/5 (20%) on our H+R+RBI over/under, against 62% on the season.

Top 5

1/520%

season 62%

Top 10

5/1050%

season 59%

Full slate

112/23049%

season 50%

Top call Michael Harris II came through. Cole Carrigg didn't.

Each hitter below carries a 0–100 matchup score — a read on the spot in front of him, not a ranking of how good he is, so a star in a brutal matchup can sit below an average hitter in a soft one. Confidence next to it is coverage: how much real data backs the number. Every call here was graded against the box score — wins and misses both, with the record on this page. How this board is built →

Final · 10–5

ATLaway

PIThomeTop matchup100 Final · 3–7

KCaway

NYMhomeTop matchup78 Final · 12–4

NYYaway

TBhomeTop matchup83 Final · 2–3

CHCaway

BALhomeTop matchup72 Final · 5–2

CLEaway

MINhomeTop matchup78 Final · 2–1

BOSaway

CWShomeTop matchup95 Final · 1–4

ATHaway

DEThomeTop matchup88 Final · 4–8

SEAaway

MIAhomeTop matchup77 Final · 1–0

PHIaway

CINhomeTop matchup100 Final · 8–4

MILaway

STLhomeTop matchup86 Final · 6–7

LAAaway

TEXhomeTop matchup68 Final · 3–1

AZaway

SDhomeTop matchup76 Final · 2–8

COLaway

SFhomeTop matchup100

Not starting59 not in the official lineup — moved to the bottom

PosSort

#Hitter · Matchup · 293 shownScore

152 with a H+R+RBILive count — updates as games play

1
Ben RiceDH
NYY@TB· 2-for-4
10H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #68
2
Jake MangumCF
PITvsATL· 4-for-5
8H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #99
3
Jake Bauers1B
MIL@STL· 2-for-4
7H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #78
T3
Nolan Schanuel1B
LAA@TEX· 4-for-4
7H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #95
T3
Mike YastrzemskiLF
ATL@PIT· 1-for-3
7H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #188
6
Brice Turang2B
MIL@STL· 2-for-5
6H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #34
T6
Seiya SuzukiRF
CHC@BAL· 3-for-4
6H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #44
T6
Casey SchmittLF
SFvsCOL· 2-for-4
6H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #87
T6
Jim JarvisSS
ATL@PIT· 3-for-5
6H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #177
T6
Griffin ConineRF
MIAvsSEA· 3-for-4
6H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #178
11
Rafael Devers1B
SFvsCOL· 2-for-4
5H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 2.0 H+R+RBI, #11
T11
Dominic CanzoneDH
SEA@MIA· 2-for-5
5H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 2.0 H+R+RBI, #32
T11
Jordan WalkerRF
STLvsMIL· 1-for-4
5H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #54
T11
Trent GrishamCF
NYY@TB· 2-for-5
5H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #60
T11
Justin Foscue2B
TEXvsLAA· 2-for-3
5H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #63
T11
Brandon NimmoRF
TEXvsLAA· 2-for-4
5H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #71
T11
Royce Lewis1B
MINvsCLE· 2-for-4
5H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #94
T11
Carson BengeRF
NYMvsKC· 2-for-3
5H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #131
T11
Wade MecklerLF
LAA@TEX· 2-for-3
5H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.5 H+R+RBI, #202
T11
Ryan McMahon3B
NYY@TB· 2-for-5
5H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.4 H+R+RBI, #220
T11
Jakob MarseeCF
MIAvsSEA· 2-for-3
5H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.4 H+R+RBI, #231
22
Otto LopezSS
MIAvsSEA· 1-for-3
4H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 2.0 H+R+RBI, #24
T22
Ozzie Albies2B
ATL@PIT· 1-for-4
4H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 2.0 H+R+RBI, #25
T22
Juan SotoLF
NYMvsKC· 1-for-2
4H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #27
T22
Matt Olson1B
ATL@PIT· 1-for-3
4H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 2.0 H+R+RBI, #31
T22
Jackson ChourioLF
MIL@STL· 2-for-5
4H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #37
T22
Drake BaldwinC
ATL@PIT· 2-for-4
4H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 2.0 H+R+RBI, #38
T22
Luis Arraez2B
SFvsCOL· 2-for-4
4H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #62
T22
Manny Machado3B
SDvsAZ· 2-for-3
4H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #75
T22
Willy AdamesSS
SFvsCOL· 1-for-5
4H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #98
T22
Randy ArozarenaLF
SEA@MIA· 1-for-3
4H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #104
T22
Caleb Durbin3B
BOS@CWS· 1-for-4
4H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #112
T22
Ezequiel DuranSS
TEXvsLAA· 1-for-4
4H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #140
T22
Cody BellingerLF
NYY@TB· 2-for-5
4H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #141
T22
Bryce EldridgeDH
SFvsCOL· 2-for-3
4H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #180
T22
Zach McKinstry2B
DETvsATH· 1-for-4
4H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.5 H+R+RBI, #198
T22
Willi Castro2B
COL@SF· 1-for-4
4H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #207
T22
Patrick BaileyC
CLE@MIN· 1-for-3
4H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.4 H+R+RBI, #219
T22
Austin WellsC
NYY@TB· 1-for-4
4H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.4 H+R+RBI, #223
T22
Max SchuemannLF
NYY@TB· 2-for-4
4H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.4 H+R+RBI, #227
T22
Leo Jiménez3B
MIAvsSEA· 2-for-4
4H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.4 H+R+RBI, #230
42
Junior Caminero3B
TBvsNYY· 1-for-4
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 2.0 H+R+RBI, #17
T42
Lane ThomasLF
KC@NYM· 1-for-4
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #40
T42
Liam HicksC
MIAvsSEA· 1-for-5
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #42
T42
Esmerlyn ValdezRF
PITvsATL· 1-for-4
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #45
T42
Brayan RocchioSS
CLE@MIN· 1-for-4
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #53
T42
Bobby Witt Jr.SS
KC@NYM· 1-for-4
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #57
T42
Tyler O'NeillRF
BALvsCHC· 1-for-3
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #61
T42
Chase DeLauterRF
CLE@MIN· 1-for-4
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #76
T42
Geraldo PerdomoSS
AZ@SD· 2-for-4
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #86
T42
Alec Burleson1B
STLvsMIL· 1-for-3
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #97
T42
Jacob WilsonSS
ATH@DET· 2-for-4
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #106
T42
Bryan ReynoldsLF
PITvsATL· 1-for-4
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #108
T42
JJ Wetherholt2B
STLvsMIL· 2-for-3
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #121
T42
Gabriel Arias3B
CLE@MIN· 1-for-4
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #122
T42
Nick Loftin3B
KC@NYM· 2-for-4
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #127
T42
Jake RogersC
DETvsATH· 1-for-1
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #132
T42
Jasson DomínguezRF
NYY@TB· 2-for-4
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #133
T42
Jared Young1B
NYMvsKC· 2-for-4
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #148
T42
Sal FrelickRF
MIL@STL· 2-for-4
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #156
T42
Nolan Arenado3B
AZ@SD· 1-for-4
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #166
T42
Drew CavanaughC
SFvsCOL· 2-for-3
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #173
T42
Chandler SimpsonLF
TBvsNYY· 2-for-4
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.5 H+R+RBI, #184
T42
Ben Williamson2B
TBvsNYY· 2-for-4
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.5 H+R+RBI, #201
T42
Cooper PrattSS
MIL@STL· 2-for-3
3H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.5 H+R+RBI, #212
66
Michael Harris IICF
ATL@PIT· 1-for-6
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 2.2 H+R+RBI, #2
T66
Romy GonzalezDH
BOS@CWS· 1-for-3
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 2.0 H+R+RBI, #6
T66
Garrett MitchellCF
MIL@STL· 1-for-5
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 2.0 H+R+RBI, #10
T66
Jonathan Aranda1B
TBvsNYY· 2-for-4
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 2.0 H+R+RBI, #13
T66
Hunter GoodmanC
COL@SF· 1-for-3
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 2.0 H+R+RBI, #14
T66
Yandy DíazDH
TBvsNYY· 1-for-4
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #18
T66
Heliot RamosLF
SFvsCOL· 1-for-5
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 2.0 H+R+RBI, #19
T66
A.J. EwingCF
NYMvsKC· 1-for-5
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #29
T66
Colson MontgomerySS
CWSvsBOS· 2-for-4
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #33
T66
Pete Crow-ArmstrongCF
CHC@BAL· 1-for-3
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #39
T66
Brandon MarshLF
PHI@CIN· 2-for-4
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #41
T66
Jake Burger1B
TEXvsLAA· 1-for-4
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #64
T66
Josh Naylor1B
SEA@MIA· 1-for-4
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #65
T66
Kyle Stowers1B
MIAvsSEA· 1-for-5
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #72
T66
Dominic SmithDH
ATL@PIT· 1-for-3
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #81
T66
Wyatt LangfordLF
TEXvsLAA· 1-for-5
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #83
T66
Mike TroutCF
LAA@TEX· 0-for-5
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #88
T66
Zach NetoSS
LAA@TEX· 1-for-4
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #93
T66
Josh Jung3B
TEXvsLAA· 1-for-4
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #110
T66
Victor Mesa Jr.RF
TBvsNYY· 1-for-2
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #113
T66
Luke RaleyRF
SEA@MIA· 2-for-4
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #116
T66
Francisco AlvarezC
NYMvsKC· 1-for-4
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #125
T66
Jorge SolerDH
LAA@TEX· 1-for-5
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #135
T66
Mauricio DubónLF
ATL@PIT· 1-for-4
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #147
T66
Alejandro OsunaLF
TEXvsLAA· 1-for-3
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #170
T66
Max KeplerLF
AZ@SD· 1-for-4
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #171
T66
Nick FortesC
TBvsNYY· 1-for-3
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #172
T66
José CaballeroSS
NYY@TB· 1-for-4
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #176
T66
Cam CauleyCF
TEXvsLAA· 1-for-3
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #182
T66
Brett Baty3B
NYMvsKC· 1-for-4
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.5 H+R+RBI, #187
T66
Justin CrawfordCF
PHI@CIN· 1-for-3
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.5 H+R+RBI, #190
T66
Jac CaglianoneRF
KC@NYM· 1-for-4
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.5 H+R+RBI, #194
T66
Lars NootbaarLF
STLvsMIL· 1-for-4
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.5 H+R+RBI, #200
T66
Tristan GraySS
MINvsCLE· 1-for-3
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.5 H+R+RBI, #210
T66
Luisangel AcuñaSS
CWSvsBOS· 1-for-2
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.5 H+R+RBI, #211
T66
Esteury RuizRF
MIAvsSEA· 1-for-4
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.5 H+R+RBI, #214
T66
Ian HappLF
CHC@BAL· 2-for-4
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.5 H+R+RBI, #215
T66
Tommy TroyLF
AZ@SD· 1-for-3
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.4 H+R+RBI, #232
T66
Jo AdellRF
LAA@TEX· 1-for-2
2H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI
105
Shea LangeliersC
ATH@DET· 1-for-2
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 2.1 H+R+RBI, #8
T105
Kyle SchwarberDH
PHI@CIN· 1-for-4
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 2.1 H+R+RBI, #9
T105
Fernando Tatis Jr.RF
SDvsAZ· 1-for-4
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 2.0 H+R+RBI, #30
T105
Bo Bichette3B
NYMvsKC· 0-for-3
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #36
T105
Matt VierlingCF
DETvsATH· 1-for-4
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #46
T105
Taylor WardDH
BALvsCHC· 1-for-3
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #48
T105
Vaughn Grissom2B
LAA@TEX· 1-for-4
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #49
T105
Jonah HeimC
ATH@DET· 1-for-4
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #51
T105
William ContrerasC
MIL@STL· 0-for-4
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #59
T105
Travis Bazzana2B
CLE@MIN· 1-for-5
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #67
T105
Hao-Yu Lee2B
DETvsATH· 1-for-4
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #73
T105
Gabriel MorenoC
AZ@SD· 1-for-4
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.9 H+R+RBI, #74
T105
Kevin McGonigleSS
DETvsATH· 1-for-4
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #79
T105
Wilyer AbreuRF
BOS@CWS· 1-for-4
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #90
T105
JJ BledayLF
CINvsPHI· 1-for-4
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #92
T105
Corbin CarrollRF
AZ@SD· 1-for-3
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI, #100
T105
Pete Alonso1B
BALvsCHC· 0-for-1
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #115
T105
Chase Meidroth2B
CWSvsBOS· 1-for-3
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #117
T105
Bryson Stott2B
PHI@CIN· 1-for-4
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #118
T105
Nico Hoerner2B
CHC@BAL· 1-for-4
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #123
T105
Nick Gonzales3B
PITvsATL· 0-for-1
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #124
T105
Starling MarteRF
KC@NYM· 1-for-3
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #128
T105
Xavier Edwards2B
MIAvsSEA· 1-for-4
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #129
T105
Gunnar HendersonSS
BALvsCHC· 0-for-3
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #134
T105
Lourdes Gurriel Jr.LF
AZ@SD· 1-for-4
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #136
T105
Tyler CallihanLF
PITvsATL· 1-for-4
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #138
T105
Tyler StephensonC
CINvsPHI· 1-for-4
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #142
T105
TJ Rumfield1B
COL@SF· 1-for-3
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.7 H+R+RBI, #146
T105
Dansby SwansonSS
CHC@BAL· 1-for-4
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #151
T105
Andrew Vaughn1B
MIL@STL· 0-for-4
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #153
T105
Connor WongC
BOS@CWS· 1-for-3
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #157
T105
Tyler TolbertSS
KC@NYM· 1-for-3
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #158
T105
Henry BolteCF
ATH@DET· 0-for-3
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #160
T105
Jazz Chisholm Jr.2B
NYY@TB· 0-for-3
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #161
T105
Kyle HigashiokaC
TEXvsLAA· 1-for-3
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #164
T105
Denzer Guzman3B
LAA@TEX· 0-for-3
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #179
T105
Kerry CarpenterRF
DETvsATH· 0-for-1
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #181
T105
Daniel SchneemannCF
CLE@MIN· 1-for-4
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.5 H+R+RBI, #185
T105
Tyler FreemanRF
COL@SF· 1-for-4
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #186
T105
Rafael Flores Jr.C
PITvsATL· 1-for-4
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.6 H+R+RBI, #189
T105
Braden MontgomeryRF
CWSvsBOS· 1-for-4
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.5 H+R+RBI, #192
T105
Colt EmersonSS
SEA@MIA· 1-for-3
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.5 H+R+RBI, #197
T105
Michael Busch1B
CHC@BAL· 1-for-4
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.5 H+R+RBI, #209
T105
Jared TrioloSS
PITvsATL· 0-for-3
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.5 H+R+RBI, #213
T105
Braxton FulfordDH
COL@SF· 1-for-3
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.5 H+R+RBI, #216
T105
Steven KwanLF
CLE@MIN· 0-for-2
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.4 H+R+RBI, #226
T105
TJ FriedlCF
CINvsPHI· 1-for-3
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.4 H+R+RBI, #228
T105
Jung Hoo LeeRF
SFvsCOL· 1-for-2
1H+R+RBIFinal
Proj 1.8 H+R+RBI

Best MLB H+R+RBI Matchups — Thursday, July 9, 2026

Cole Carrigg (COL) is the top h+r+rbi matchup on the Thursday, July 9, 2026 board at 100, with Michael Harris II (ATL) and Elly De La Cruz (CIN) right behind. Every hitter on the slate is ranked by combined hits + runs + RBI upside — the best all-around production — the bat, the arm and bullpen they face, batting order, park, and weather. It's the read DFS and prop players make before lock.

Top h+r+rbi spot: Cole Carrigg

Cole Carrigg (COL) tops the board at 100, projected for about 0.48 H+R+RBI per plate appearance across 4.5 projected trips. We build the number bottom-up — summing his projection on every component board — so it moves with each of those matchups instead of a single rate, and inherits their tuning.

The rest of the top of the board

Michael Harris II (ATL) (100) vs RHP the starter: a solid bat at .475 into an arm with little track record against the same side.
Elly De La Cruz (CIN) (100) vs RHP the starter: a solid bat at .465 into an arm with little track record against the same side.
Jake McCarthy (COL) (96) vs RHP the starter: a solid bat at .453 into an arm with little track record against the same side.
Ceddanne Rafaela (BOS) (95) vs RHP the starter: a solid bat at .453 into an arm with little track record against the same side.
Romy Gonzalez (BOS) (93) vs RHP the starter: a solid bat at .471 into an arm with little track record against the same side.
Trea Turner (PHI) (92) vs RHP the starter: a solid bat at .451 into an arm with little track record against the same side.
Shea Langeliers (ATH) (88) vs RHP the starter: a solid bat at .463 into an arm with little track record against the same side.

How it played out

5 of the top 10 h+r+rbi matchups landed at least one H+R+RBI. Top play Cole Carrigg finished with 0 H+R+RBI. We post the result next to every projection so you can grade the board yourself — and so the model gets re-tuned against what actually happened.

How to read these h+r+rbi matchups

Each score (0–100) starts with the hitter's combined hits + runs + RBIs per plate appearance against the hand he's facing — weighted toward the last two weeks, then the season, then a two-year baseline. Then it layers in the bullpen, his spot in the order, and park and weather. Higher means more of it points his way. It's context, not a lock — a great spot still goes 0-for-4 sometimes, and a tough one runs into one. The edge is in stacking the odds, and since we grade every board, you can see how often the top of the list delivers.

Keep reading

What the hits + runs + RBIs board is

The H+R+RBI board projects a hitter's combined H+R+RBI vs the book's line. One statistical model scores every matchup on the slate the same way — a star and a backup judged on the matchup in front of them, not their name — and every number is graded against the real box score once the games go final.

How the model gets its number

It isn't a gut call or a name game. The projection is built from a few things:

His hit, run, and RBI projections, composed from the tuned component boards.

Those pieces combine into one number, and the model re-tunes itself weekly against how its past calls actually landed.

Is there a betting edge here?

Composed from our tuned hit/run/RBI numbers, this grades efficient — no edge in any gap bin. Transparency board.

How to use it

A tidy one-number read on a hitter's all-around night; research, not a play.

Everything here is a research signal from the model, graded in public — not betting advice, and no outcome is guaranteed.

Learn more: How the model works · The picks story · Today's plays

Frequently asked questions

Who has the best h+r+rbi matchup today (Thursday, July 9, 2026)?: Cole Carrigg (COL) — top of the board at 100, facing RHP the starter. A solid bat into a beatable arm is what pushes it to No. 1.
What are the best MLB h+r+rbi matchups today (Thursday, July 9, 2026)?: The top h+r+rbi matchups on Thursday, July 9, 2026: Cole Carrigg (100), Michael Harris II (100), Elly De La Cruz (100), Jake McCarthy (96), Ceddanne Rafaela (95). The full board ranks every hitter in every game by h+r+rbi upside.
Did the top h+r+rbi matchup get a H+R+RBI on Thursday, July 9, 2026?: No — Cole Carrigg didn't record a H+R+RBI.
How is the h+r+rbi matchup score calculated?: It blends three routes to the line: his hit rate against that hand, the bats in front of him for RBI, and the bats behind him for runs. Recent form counts most. Then the bullpen, order spot and park. 0–100 across the slate.
What does H+R+RBI mean?: It adds a hitter's hits, runs scored, and runs batted in into one number — the books call it a combo prop. It rewards all-around production: a 2-hit night with a run and an RBI is 4. Per plate appearance, around .45 is league average.
What does the score actually mean?: Higher is better. H+R+RBI is the most forgiving prop on the board — three ways to get there — so scores run higher here than on any single-outcome board. Compare within this board, not across.
What's the confidence meter?: It's how much data is behind the call — sample size on both the hitter and the pitcher, plus whether the lineup's official. A high score with low confidence is a thinner read than the same score backed by a deep track record. It's not a probability of a H+R+RBI.
What is a platoon split (handedness split)?: This board stacks three outcomes, so the platoon split compounds. The opposite hand lifts his own hit chances and the chances he's on base when the next guy drives him in.
What are park factors?: A park that produces hits produces all three legs of this number. Gaps, altitude, and weather raise the whole line together. Above 1.00 bumps the score, below 1.00 trims it.
What do "2W", "SZN" and "2Y" mean?: The timeframes behind each rate: the last two weeks (recent form), the current season, and a trailing two years (a stable baseline). Recent form counts most, and small samples get pulled toward league average so a hot week doesn't fool the model.
What do "≈ est", "Due" and "Not starting" mean?: "≈ est" is a hitter we don't have splits for yet — a rookie or unmatched ID — shown at a league-baseline estimate instead of dropped. "Due" means he hasn't recorded a H+R+RBI in a while and profiles for regression. "Not starting" means he was projected but didn't make the official lineup, so he slides to the bottom where you can still look him up.
Can I use this for h+r+rbi props or DFS?: That's what it's built for — pre-slate research. The board surfaces which hitters have the best conditions today, and where one exists, we show the book's "1+ H+R+RBI" line so you can shop the price. We're not a sportsbook and we don't post picks — we show the matchup data, the line, and the result. (Best-price and all-book odds are a Pro feature.)
How accurate is the model?: We grade every board against the box score. Three ways to clear one line makes this the most forgiving prop we publish, and the hit rate reflects that — compare it against the other boards' rates, not in isolation.
When do lineups update?: Projected lineups (marked "Proj") come from each team's last game. Official lineups usually drop about two hours before first pitch, and the board updates itself as they post. Batting order is a big driver, so it's worth a second look mid-afternoon — rankings shift as lineups lock.
Is MatchWiz free?: Yes. The full board, every game page, and the daily archive are free, no login. Best-price odds and the betting tools are the paid tier.